Article View: alt.games.duke3d
Article #68931Re: which version?
From: bk... Raymond Martineau
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 00:00
25 lines
1140 bytes
1140 bytes
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 11:10:16 -0500, Curio...@SpamXcornerpub.com (CuriousOne) wrote: >Which is better? > >DUKE !ZONE FOR DUKE NUKEM 3D >DUKE ASSAULT >DUKE IT OUT IN D.C. >DUKE NUKEM 3D: PLUTONIUM PAK >DUKE NUKEM 3-D >DUKE NUCLEAR WINTER >DUKE XTREME >DUKE NUKEM 3D: ATOMIC EDITION > Well, at looking at some of the titles, some of them are upgrade patches for another, some are combinations of another, and some are third party add-on patches for another. Buy the base version, and continue from there. (Or the courageous folks could go for the Atomic Edition directly.) -- Raymond Martineau - bk...@freenet.carleton.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<381d003b.9482796@news.ncf.carleton.ca>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<MPG.128633ef2c38cf059896a9@news.news-service.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: bk...@freenet.carleton.ca (Raymond Martineau) Subject: Re: which version? Date: 1999/11/01 Message-ID: <381d003b.9482796@news.ncf.carleton.ca> X-Deja-AN: 542944106 Sender: bk...@freenet.carleton.ca (Raymond Martineau) References: <MPG.128633ef2c38cf059896a9@news.news-service.com> Organization: National Capital Freenet, Ottawa, Canada Newsgroups: alt.games.duke3d MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit