🚀 go-pugleaf

Put a gun to your head and pull the trigger.

For the benefit of those that tired of the OP's drivel before reaching
the end, the only question was:

"My dog is sad.  How can I cheer her up?"

Greg Maxey wrote:
> For the benefit of those that tired of the OP's drivel before reaching
> the end, the only question was:
>
> "My dog is sad.  How can I cheer her up?"

Feed her cheeseburgers, good cheeseburgers, the kind that come form the
stands, and play catch with her.

That's what we did for Jess, and she was a very happy dog.

O good.
Another another wacko explanation I can use to teach my students  why 
most of the folks they will face in the real world have not the 
slightest idea of what they are talking about.


Hint to promoters of Wacko WTC theories.  The reason explosive 
demolition causes buildings to fall straight down is the same reason 
fire causes buildings to fall straight down.  The force is called 
"gravity"

I realize that it is a very hard concept for some folks to understand 
but think of the experiment (falsely) attributed to Galileo.  In the 
absence of wind you drop your cannon ball from the rail of the Leaning 
tower and it goes, wonder of wonders,  straight down. If you drop a 
second cannon ball from the same spot, it will hit the first cannon 
ball. Gravity works that way. No mystery, no Conspiracy no hidden 
explosives.

It takes "work" to have a building collapse any other way

Prof.Vincent Brannigan
Department of Fire Protection Engineering
University of Maryland

AnybodyLikeHansonLikeMe1@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> There was no Flight 93!
> 
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc&search=united%2093
> 
> +Why Did WTC 7 Completely Collapse On 9/11?+
> 
> On 9/11, three buildings collapsed, supposedly from fire. The Twin
> Towers, both which were hit by airplanes, had collapsed in the morning.
> WTC 7 was NOT hit by an airplane. Yet it collapsed near symmetrically,
> near freefall speed, practically into own footprint. (The Towers'
> collapses also have these characteristics.)
> 
> Watch the video from CBS News and see the collapse of WTC 7 for
> yourself!
> http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/wtc-7_cbs_demolition.mpg
> 
> The official government-sponsored reports claim (although admittedly
> not conclusively) that WTC 7 collapsed from a combination of random
> fires and being hit by debris from the falling South Tower. Does the
> video look like a "fire" collapse?
> 
> More videos of the WTC 7 collapse here:
> http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
> 
> Here's a zoom in of one of them. Why are puffs of smoke going up the
> building?
> http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/Flashes/squibs_along_southwest_corner.htm
> 
> Looks very similar to these:
> http://www.implosionworld.com/cinema.htm
> 
> 
> WTC 7 was a 47 story steel framed building. It was NOT hit by an
> airplane.
> 
> The leaseholder of WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, admitted on a PBS
> documentary titled "America Rebuilds" that they decided to
> "pull" WTC 7. Here's the video clip:
> http://www.911blogger.com/files/video/wtc7_pbs.WMV
> 
> "Pull" is slang for professionally demolish, as demonstrated by
> this video clip from the same documentary:
> http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/video/wtc7/pull_wtc6.wmv
> 
> Last year Silverstein Properties said that Silverstein meant "pull
> the firefighters" out of the building. However... he did not say
> "pull them", or "pull the firefighters". He said "pull IT".
> Besides, according to NIST, FEMA, and a New York Times article, there
> was no firefighting in WTC 7. Links to these articles are at the bottom
> of the following page:
> http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/silverstein_answers_wtc7_charges.htm
> 
> How many of you know that WTC 7 leaseholder Silverstein bought a 99
> year lease on the Twin Towers just six weeks before they collapsed?
> Here's an article from the NY Daily News:
> http://www.nydailynews.com/news/local/story/358271p-305310c.html
> 
> The following article shows that the Port Authority of NY wanted to
> demolish the WTC for years because of the asbestos:
> http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_611.shtml
> 
> 
> Steel framed high rises have *never* completely collapsed from fire!
> Yet on 9/11, three steel framed skyscrapers collapsed in downtown
> Manhattan. All three came straight down, at near freefall speed. All
> three had puffs of smoke coming out the sides, and molten metal in the
> rubble for weeks after the events. The following paper has references
> from published sources verifying all these facts:
> http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
> 
> The above paper is not proof of controlled demolitions. It merely calls
> for a new investigation into the collapses. It also calls for the
> release of thousands of pictures and other evidence that the government
> is holding under lock and key. Please support by signing this petition:
> http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/929981172?ltl=1146201402
> ------
> 
> To the tune of the Beach Boy's "Barbera Ann"
> 
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> 
> Go bomb Ira-a-an... we'll take their la-a-and.
> Go bomb Ira-a-an...
> Because the drop in all my polling
> Has my party reeling; bomb Iran!
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> 
> Iran's leader rants, giving me my chance.
> Gonna bomb Iran, and overrule those smarty-pants;
> We'll bomb Iran,
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> Because the drop in all my polling
> Has my party reeling; bomb Iran!
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> 
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> 
> Me and my crew... here's what we will do...
> War to pursue... Iran's oil, or I'm through;
> Let's bomb Iran,
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> Because the drop in all my polling
> Has my party reeling; bomb Iran!
> Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran!
> 
> Bomb Iran, bomb Iran!
> Bomb Iran, bomb Iran!
> Bomb Iran, bomb Iran!
> Bomb Iran, bomb Iran!
> 
> (fade)
> 
> 
> PS. My dog is sad. How can I cheer her up?
> 

Dude, you're a moron.

The specifics don't matter.

This is a distraction.

It's a deliberate distraction from the REAL question:

whodunnit

You dummies and enablers....it was organized crime and the far right.

Just because they rooked in some of their Arab buddies doesn't mean they 
didn't do it.

Stop being so stupid and enabling, American people.

"Vince" <fir...@firelaw.us> wrote in message 
news:LfOdnZlMNNThUfnZ4p2dnA@comcast.com...

    Say, Vince,

    Just curious...

    Any relation to Francis Brannigan of  "Building Construction for the 
Fire Service" fame?

    S-M 

In message <k7SdnXZ9ybq6L-HZRVn-pQ@comcast.com>, StreetMedic 
<zhyvaxxeSPAMMERJAMMER@comcast.net> writes
>
>"Vince" <firelaw@firelaw.us> wrote in message
>news:LfOdnZlMNNThUfnZ4p2dnA@comcast.com...
>
>    Say, Vince,
>
>    Just curious...
>
>    Any relation to Francis Brannigan of  "Building Construction for the
>Fire Service" fame?

Father and son, if memory serves.

-- 
Paul J. Adam

"Paul J. Adam" <news@jrwlynch.demon.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:Tq4OAjGKSLfEFwji@jrwlynch.demon.co.uk...
> In message <k7SdnXZ9ybq6L-HZRVn-pQ@comcast.com>, StreetMedic 
> <zhyvaxxeSPAMMERJAMMER@comcast.net> writes
>>
>>"Vince" <firelaw@firelaw.us> wrote in message
>>news:LfOdnZlMNNThUfnZ4p2dnA@comcast.com...
>>
>>    Say, Vince,
>>
>>    Just curious...
>>
>>    Any relation to Francis Brannigan of  "Building Construction for the
>>Fire Service" fame?
>
> Father and son, if memory serves.
>
> -- 
> Paul J. Adam

    Makes sense.  Seemed like too much of coincidence, but you never know.