Article View: alt.games.doom
Article #94108Re: Doom 3 Benchmark under +4200 AMD 64 X2 - slower than 3000+
From: McGrandpa
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 04:39
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 04:39
40 lines
3174 bytes
3174 bytes
"The Primate" <primate@primate.com> wrote in message news:wm6kf.121644$gh1.45352@fe09.news.easynews.com... > Just wondering what your experience is. I was getting 46 under an AMD > Athlon 3000+ and just after installing an 4200+ X2 I was getting 40. > > I had read that my processor was roughly equal to a 3500+ single core so I > was expecting a slightly higher frame rate. Good news is it shines in > multi-tasking, something I do alot when not gaming. Expecially at > work.... > > McGrandpa? You had a previous thread on X2. > > RT > For some things the X2 4800+ flat out runs circles around my P4 3.0E. One thing I think I'm looking at is that both the 64 bit architecture and dual core potential are practically wasted under XP Pro 32 bit. A number of A64 single core cpu's DO play Doom3 faster than this rig. And Quake4, Far Cry, etc. Where this thing stands up and completely leaves ALL the others behind is under a 64 bit OS. Far Cry 64 is awesome. But it's a damn lonely world right now, the 64 bit OS. A few games, a few apps. Blinding speed, incredibly smooth. But still have a few periph manufacturers that haven't blessed us with 64 bit drivers. Epson HAS, so I can scan. But Wacom hasn't so I can't draw, and HP hasn't for my printer so I can't use even a third of its capabilities. The 4800+ has a core freq of 2.4gHz. FSB is 2000mhz. I think a A64 3800+ will keep up with it just fine in XP 32 bit. X64 does utilize dual cpu more than XP32. Still, though the fr's are only a little bit higher in Doom3 and HL2 they appear to run much smoother even when the fr's drop low. The P4 with the same 6800GT in it, same PC3200 at DDR400 and dual channel does not look as smooth at all. And I enjoyed Doom3, HL2 and Far Cry with the P4 and 6800GT under XP 32bit. I'm still trying things out and experimenting with different things, as time permits. The one thing I'm not doing is overclocking anything at all. What are we using for benchmarking Doom3? Lemme know and I'll bench it for ya. McG.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8k9kf.22023$Au1.6931@tornado.texas.rr.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone.austin.rr.com!news.rr.com!tornado.texas.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<wm6kf.121644$gh1.45352@fe09.news.easynews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone.austin.rr.com!news.rr.com!tornado.texas.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "McGrandpa" <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.games.doom References: <wm6kf.121644$gh1.45352@fe09.news.easynews.com> Subject: Re: Doom 3 Benchmark under +4200 AMD 64 X2 - slower than 3000+ Lines: 42 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-ID: <8k9kf.22023$Au1.6931@tornado.texas.rr.com> Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 04:39:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.114.225.125 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: tornado.texas.rr.com 1133584772 70.114.225.125 (Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:39:32 CST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:39:32 CST Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit