🚀 go-pugleaf

thumper wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:44:48 -0000, "EvilBill" <quake2lives@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> thumper wrote:
>>> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 18:58:21 -0000, "EvilBill"
>>> <quake2lives@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is from the same intelligence services that said Saddam had
>>>> nukes and nerve gas ready to launch at the West within 45 minutes,
>>>> though. I'd sooner send my girlfriend out to fight in Iraq than
>>>> believe anything they have to say.
>>>
>>> So, let me get this straight here then.  Whatever facts the
>>> "warmongers" report as the truth regarding the invasion of Iraq is
>>> highly questionable and suspect, but whatever facts the "pacifists"
>>> present as the truth concerning the same subject can be relied on
>>> with 100% certainty?
>>>
>>
>> Nope. I just don't believe what *anybody* says. That way I'm never
>> disappointed when it all turns out to be lies, misinformation,
>> propaganda or just plain wrong.
>
> And you hate Tony Blair and George Jr.  So, I stand corrected, British
> Left Wing wacko then.
>

So I'm a whacko to believe that launching unprovoked invasions, while
simultaneously taking away civil liberties (you probably don't know about
the new powers granted to the police over here, which allowed them to, among
other things, shoot an innocent man in the head, and detain an 11-year-old
girl for attending an anti-war demonstration) is the mark of two governments
that have nobody's interests at heart but their own greed?

> Care to explain Saddam's super cannon aimed at Israel and *NERVE*
> gassing the Kurds then?
>
> Wait, Saddam didn't have any weapons, did he?

If he had them, he'd have used them on our forces during the invasion.
Simple as that.

The gassing of the Kurds was a very long time ago, and so was the whole
'supergun' thing. (I might note, the supergun was never actually completed
anyway...)

-- 
-- 
"I hope you don't object to my badgering the witless!"

EvilBill - http://www.evilbill.org.uk
yahoo: evilbill_agqx