🚀 go-pugleaf

thumper wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 00:40:46 -0000, "EvilBill" <quake2lives@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> thumper wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:48:22 -0500, "George M. Reagan"
>>> <georgeunderscorereagan@hellmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey, what's not to like?  Torture, gulags, an illegal war and the
>>>> trashing of the constitution.  It's all fun!
>>>>
>>>> G.
>>>
>>> Yeah, but all that's still better than getting your ass blown to
>>> shreds just because you refuse to (be forced to) embrace another
>>> ethnic groups supposed deity.
>>
>> And Iraq had exactly *what* to do with bin Laden, and exactly *what*
>> capability to wage war against *anybody*?
>> WMD my ass.
>
> Who T.F. said the above statement had anything to do with Iraq,
> Genius?
>
> Saddam sure as hell didn't fly those airliners into the WTC (He might
> have danced about it afterwards upon hearing the news of it happening
> though).
>

So why did we invade the place?
As for bin Laden, he doesn't hate the West because we're not Muslims, he
just uses Islam as a platform for his political views. He hates the West
because 1) we aid Israel and 2) we helped engineer the circumstances that
put Saddam in power. He and Saddam were mortal enemies after all,
politically speaking.

> Goddamn, you left wing Bush haters sure are a touchy lot. :-/

Blair hater, in my case, being British. You guys over there probably don't
hear a lot about what's happening here, but we're having more and more of
our civil liberties eroded, by a government that just kowtows to whatever
the US wants. And turns a blind eye to torture and imprisonment without
legal recourse, too. (Hell, they do it themselves, too...)

-- 
-- 
"I hope you don't object to my badgering the witless!"

EvilBill - http://www.evilbill.org.uk
yahoo: evilbill_agqx