Thread View: alt.games.diablo
10 messages
10 total messages
Started by Zombie Elvis
Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:08
A Charge-adin Faces a Choice, Concentration vs Fanatacism
Author: Zombie Elvis
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:08
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:08
28 lines
2023 bytes
2023 bytes
I've always wanted to play a Paladin who specialized in Charge and
have actually started and abandoned several Charge-adins over the
years. Now, I've finally taken a Charge-adin all the way through
Normal -- he's about to face off against the Ancients and Baal but
otherwise he's had great success in Normal mode and is now doing well
over 1200 points of damage with a Merciless Pike and some + damage
items.
He's already maxed Charge and now I'm faced with a dilemma, what aura
should he use. I know that everyone says that you should use
Fanaticism for all melee Paladins but the thing is that right now my
Paladin does more damage using Concentration looks to do so for the
foreseeable future. Weapon speed doesn't matter with Charge so the
attack speed boost from Fanaticism doesn't really matter. I play
single player, so my only partner is my Rogue merc and I don't have to
worry about supporting party members.
So in my mind it makes more sense to put points in Concentration than
into Fanaticism.
--
"Fate is like a caged gorilla. If you mock it, it
will pelt you with dung."
-- Warriv
Roberto Castillo
robertocastillo@ameritech.net
http://www.freewebs.com/robertocastillo/
Re: A Charge-adin Faces a Choice, Concentration vs Fanatacism
Author: Gumby
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:43
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:43
30 lines
2457 bytes
2457 bytes
Zombie Elvis wrote:
> He's already maxed Charge and now I'm faced with a dilemma, what aura
> should he use. I know that everyone says that you should use
> Fanaticism for all melee Paladins but the thing is that right now my
> Paladin does more damage using Concentration looks to do so for the
> foreseeable future. Weapon speed doesn't matter with Charge so the
> attack speed boost from Fanaticism doesn't really matter. I play
> single player, so my only partner is my Rogue merc and I don't have to
> worry about supporting party members.
>
> So in my mind it makes more sense to put points in Concentration than
> into Fanaticism.
Concentration has a slightly higher damage bonus, but only to begin
with. Fanatacism catches up and at level 6 and starts to surpass it Its
only real advantage is that you can start building it earlier so it
seems higher than it is by the time you get Fanatacism.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20
Concentration 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 270 345
Fanatacism 50 67 84 101 118 135 152 169 186 203 288 373
But if you never have any plans to use that character in multiplayer and
have already invested several levels in Concentration, I suppose you
might as well stick with that.
--
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They
never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our
people, and neither do we." - George W. Bush [August 5th, 2004]
Re: A Charge-adin Faces a Choice, Concentration vs Fanatacism
Author: Shiflet
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:20
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:20
13 lines
1705 bytes
1705 bytes
"Zombie Elvis" <DELETEMETOREPLYrobertocastillo@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:jcdj2399gbbnmfb31u6ddmtnpfdc0edak7@4ax.com... > He's already maxed Charge and now I'm faced with a dilemma, what aura > should he use. I know that everyone says that you should use > Fanaticism for all melee Paladins but the thing is that right now my > Paladin does more damage using Concentration Maxed fana adds more than maxed conc. It also adds AR. It is also useful for times when you won't be able to charge and will be forced to use a secondary attack. There's really no contest here, fana is better in basically every way.
Re: A Charge-adin Faces a Choice, Concentration vs Fanatacism
Author: Mickey
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 14:13
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 14:13
31 lines
2923 bytes
2923 bytes
"Gumby" <gumbyjd@eastlink.spammersmustdie.ca> wrote in message news:uNmWh.12998$VF5.7634@edtnps82... > Zombie Elvis wrote: >> He's already maxed Charge and now I'm faced with a dilemma, what aura >> should he use. I know that everyone says that you should use >> Fanaticism for all melee Paladins but the thing is that right now my >> Paladin does more damage using Concentration looks to do so for the >> foreseeable future. Weapon speed doesn't matter with Charge so the >> attack speed boost from Fanaticism doesn't really matter. I play >> single player, so my only partner is my Rogue merc and I don't have to >> worry about supporting party members. So in my mind it makes more sense >> to put points in Concentration than >> into Fanaticism. > > Concentration has a slightly higher damage bonus, but only to begin with. > Fanatacism catches up and at level 6 and starts to surpass it Its only > real advantage is that you can start building it earlier so it seems > higher than it is by the time you get Fanatacism. > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 > Concentration 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 270 345 > Fanatacism 50 67 84 101 118 135 152 169 186 203 288 373 > > But if you never have any plans to use that character in multiplayer and > have already invested several levels in Concentration, I suppose you might > as well stick with that. You forgot one MASSIVE difference. Concentration adds ONLY to damage. Fanaticism adds to attack rating. Mickey
Re: A Charge-adin Faces a Choice, Concentration vs Fanatacism
Author: Zombie Elvis
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:27
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:27
35 lines
2507 bytes
2507 bytes
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:13:08 -0400, "Mickey"
<XXmickeybXX@XXcomcastXX.net> wrote:
>"Gumby" <gumbyjd@eastlink.spammersmustdie.ca> wrote in message
>news:uNmWh.12998$VF5.7634@edtnps82...
>> Concentration has a slightly higher damage bonus, but only to begin with.
>> Fanatacism catches up and at level 6 and starts to surpass it Its only
>> real advantage is that you can start building it earlier so it seems
>> higher than it is by the time you get Fanatacism.
>>
>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20
>> Concentration 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 270 345
>> Fanatacism 50 67 84 101 118 135 152 169 186 203 288 373
>>
>> But if you never have any plans to use that character in multiplayer and
>> have already invested several levels in Concentration, I suppose you might
>> as well stick with that.
>
>You forgot one MASSIVE difference. Concentration adds ONLY to damage.
>Fanaticism adds to attack rating.
But does that really make a huge difference with Charge? Charge
already boosts your attack rating all by itself and its main advantage
for me is that it is a ranged skill which does a lot of damage. I only
have one point each in both Concentration and Fanaticism so I could go
either way and I'm curious about the pros and cons of each skill.
--
"Fate is like a caged gorilla. If you mock it, it
will pelt you with dung."
-- Warriv
Roberto Castillo
robertocastillo@ameritech.net
http://www.freewebs.com/robertocastillo/
Re: A Charge-adin Faces a Choice, Concentration vs Fanatacism
Author: Zombie Elvis
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:36
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:36
35 lines
2395 bytes
2395 bytes
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:20:48 -0500, "Shiflet" <rshiflet@charter.net>
wrote:
>
>"Zombie Elvis" <DELETEMETOREPLYrobertocastillo@ameritech.net> wrote in
>message news:jcdj2399gbbnmfb31u6ddmtnpfdc0edak7@4ax.com...
>
>> He's already maxed Charge and now I'm faced with a dilemma, what aura
>> should he use. I know that everyone says that you should use
>> Fanaticism for all melee Paladins but the thing is that right now my
>> Paladin does more damage using Concentration
>
>Maxed fana adds more than maxed conc. It also adds AR. It is also useful for
>times when you won't be able to charge and will be forced to use a secondary
>attack. There's really no contest here, fana is better in basically every
>way.
>
At the moment I'm using Zeal with Holy Freeze as my secondary attack.
My secondary weapon is the Hellplague Longsword which has dual leech
and it works very well. I also use the Umbral Disk as my shield during
secondary attacks (my primarily weapon is a Merciless Pike with no
shield for Charging). This setup works very well for me as the Umbral
Disks ability to blind targets works very well with the slowing that
comes from Holy Freeze.
This is why I'm wondering if I'll ever need Fanaticism or if it's so
good that I'll eventually want to switch over to it anyway.
--
"Fate is like a caged gorilla. If you mock it, it
will pelt you with dung."
-- Warriv
Roberto Castillo
robertocastillo@ameritech.net
http://www.freewebs.com/robertocastillo/
Re: A Charge-adin Faces a Choice, Concentration vs Fanatacism
Author: Gumby
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:47
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:47
11 lines
1455 bytes
1455 bytes
Zombie Elvis wrote: > At the moment I'm using Zeal with Holy Freeze as my secondary attack. Then you'll definitely want Fanatacism. Since you haven't put more than one point in each yet, there's no real reason to go with Concentration that I can see. -- "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." - George W. Bush [August 5th, 2004]
Re: A Charge-adin Faces a Choice, Concentration vs Fanatacism
Author: Shiflet
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:07
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 05:07
21 lines
1963 bytes
1963 bytes
"Zombie Elvis" <DELETEMETOREPLYrobertocastillo@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:g0il23hkd1a8rrevt5fbgv3r7maje3eaei@4ax.com... > This is why I'm wondering if I'll ever need Fanaticism or if it's so > good that I'll eventually want to switch over to it anyway. Fana adds more damage than conc. Enemies in hell become harder to hit. Fana adds AR as well. Eventually, you will encounter places where charge isn't viable. Fana will help you kill them faster with Zeal. Really, there's absolutely NO reason to use conc over Fana unless you're a hammerdin. It deals less damage, adds no AR, and doesn't increase attack speed... > -- > "Fate is like a caged gorilla. If you mock it, it > will pelt you with dung." > -- Warriv > > Roberto Castillo > robertocastillo@ameritech.net > http://www.freewebs.com/robertocastillo/
Re: A Charge-adin Faces a Choice, Concentration vs Fanatacism
Author: Mickey
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:00
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:00
38 lines
3116 bytes
3116 bytes
"Zombie Elvis" <DELETEMETOREPLYrobertocastillo@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:ehgl23td81reetq0mu6lpvdr4bg5g94ug0@4ax.com... > On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:13:08 -0400, "Mickey" > <XXmickeybXX@XXcomcastXX.net> wrote: > >>"Gumby" <gumbyjd@eastlink.spammersmustdie.ca> wrote in message >>news:uNmWh.12998$VF5.7634@edtnps82... > >>> Concentration has a slightly higher damage bonus, but only to begin >>> with. >>> Fanatacism catches up and at level 6 and starts to surpass it Its only >>> real advantage is that you can start building it earlier so it seems >>> higher than it is by the time you get Fanatacism. >>> >>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 >>> Concentration 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 270 345 >>> Fanatacism 50 67 84 101 118 135 152 169 186 203 288 373 >>> >>> But if you never have any plans to use that character in multiplayer and >>> have already invested several levels in Concentration, I suppose you >>> might >>> as well stick with that. >> >>You forgot one MASSIVE difference. Concentration adds ONLY to damage. >>Fanaticism adds to attack rating. > > But does that really make a huge difference with Charge? Charge > already boosts your attack rating all by itself and its main advantage > for me is that it is a ranged skill which does a lot of damage. I only > have one point each in both Concentration and Fanaticism so I could go > either way and I'm curious about the pros and cons of each skill. It sure does, especially in PvP :) Also, Fanaticism improves the stats of party members and mercs, especially the attack speeds. Mickey
Re: A Charge-adin Faces a Choice, Concentration vs Fanatacism
Author: Mark
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:01
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:01
29 lines
2396 bytes
2396 bytes
"Zombie Elvis" <DELETEMETOREPLYrobertocastillo@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:jcdj2399gbbnmfb31u6ddmtnpfdc0edak7@4ax.com... > > I've always wanted to play a Paladin who specialized in Charge and > have actually started and abandoned several Charge-adins over the > years. I've got a Charger, and he's a blast to play. But it's a limited character and I only play mine multiplayer. As a SP toon you're going to have your problems. PI's being the most prominent. But by all means, play the character while he's fun, they are a great toon. I went with max Fanaticism on mine. There are situations when you'll have to Zeal, so you'll be glad for Fanat. This may be how you deal with PI's, Zealing with a high elemental damage weapon. So the speed boost on Fanat is critical. And it will also benefit your merc. I went with a Mightyman for mine, the damage boost let me one hit kill most monsters in medium sized games through A2 Hell, where he currently sits. I also am currently using an Insight Elder Staff as my weapon. It has a nice tight damage range so it gives me fairly consistent damage. And the Meditation with Prayer synergy is gravy. Have fun and keep us updated on your progress. Regards- Mark Bongo Fury
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads