Re: Negative review of Diablo by Gamecenter!

Article View: alt.games.diablo

Article #569

#569

From: Claus Grøvdal
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 00:00

13 lines
1064 bytes

Gordon K Wilson wrote:
>Why compare battle.net (free) to TEN (pay for play)? Why bitch
> about spawned copies? It would not have been so bad if these supposed
> negatives were followed with some deserved kudos but they are not. The
> review is terribly biased and one sided and I expected more from
> Gamecenter.

Obviously this gamerX, whoever they are, have no clue. His review said
Diablo could only be played on battle.net. Well, do your homework next
time gamerX; You can play Diablo on Kali too.

SuperClaus

Technical Details

Message-ID: <32F9F989.4E4C@origo.no>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <32F8F372.1963@ix.netcom.com> <Pine.GSO.3.94.970206120909.28882A-100000@alpha.qmw.ac.uk> <32F9F5E9.2FFD@ix.netcom.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: Claus Grøvdal <cl...@origo.no>
Subject: Re: Negative review of Diablo by Gamecenter!
Date: 1997/02/06
Message-ID: <32F9F989.4E4C@origo.no>
X-Deja-AN: 214862478
references: <32F8F372.1963@ix.netcom.com> <Pine.GSO.3.94.970206120909.28882A-100000@alpha.qmw.ac.uk> <32F9F5E9.2FFD@ix.netcom.com>
organization: Origo, Kinetik
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,alt.games.diablo
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message