Article View: alt.games.diablo
Article #573Re: Negative review of Diablo by Gamecenter!
From: Gordon K Wilson
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 00:00
41 lines
2808 bytes
2808 bytes
Homer Simpson wrote:
> Gord, you're still confused (no offense) but that *ISN'T* the
> Gamecenter review. The actual review was written by Hugh Falk and may
> be found, funnily enough, in the Reviews section. :)
I saw that review also and was pretty impressed with it. It
complimented the game on its strengths and also mentioned that (as far
as the reviewer was concerned) a few things could also use some
improving. It was a balanced review. This GamerX wrote an alternative
review and ignored a great many things. Since the URL for the GamerX
review is also at Gamercenter I mentioned that it was a Gamercenter
review. It seems that there are two of them. One at Gamercenter/Reviews
and another at Gamecenter/Xperts. Oh well!
> And to address another poster's comment re: playing Diablo over the
> internet using Kali, when Diablo was first released in early January,
> Kali couldn't work with it out of the box. Now with the 1.1 betas, it
> does but with varying degrees of success. So far in my experience,
> games initiated via Battlenet seem to work better than ones started
> using Kali. However, that may change as Kali continues to be tweaked
> by its programmers. GamerX is no doubt referring to the fact that
> Quake has already set a precedent by allowing internet games without
> requiring logging into a single specific server (or a third-party
> program like Kali which GamerX forgot about).
I also have had problems with KALI and Diablo. I have yet to get it
to work to my satisfaction. Thankfully I have never had any problems
getting onto battle.net and using KALI has not become a necessity for
me.
QUAKE is a great game and a lot of fun when played on a server. But
try getting 4 people together (all with 28.8 modems) and have one person
be the "server" and everyone else connect to his IP. The "server" will
run around and blast the hell out of everyone while the "clients" can
barely move at all. It doesn't work very well.
Gordon Wilson
gkwi...@ix.netcom.com
IronWill on battle.net and KALI
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32FB4C1A.758E@ix.netcom.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<32F8F372.1963@ix.netcom.com> <Pine.GSO.3.94.970206120909.28882A-100000@alpha.qmw.ac.uk> <32F9F5E9.2FFD@ix.netcom.com> <32F9F989.4E4C@origo.no> <32F605BE.561A@pop.uky.edu> <32FABCB1.D75@ix.netcom.com> <32fade52.27816108@news.pathcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Gordon K Wilson <gkwi...@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: Negative review of Diablo by Gamecenter! Date: 1997/02/07 Message-ID: <32FB4C1A.758E@ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 215090514 references: <32F8F372.1963@ix.netcom.com> <Pine.GSO.3.94.970206120909.28882A-100000@alpha.qmw.ac.uk> <32F9F5E9.2FFD@ix.netcom.com> <32F9F989.4E4C@origo.no> <32F605BE.561A@pop.uky.edu> <32FABCB1.D75@ix.netcom.com> <32fade52.27816108@news.pathcom.com> organization: None x-netcom-date: Fri Feb 07 7:38:22 AM PST 1997 mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: gkwi...@ix.netcom.com newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,alt.games.diablo x-mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit