Article View: alt.games.diablo
Article #544366Re: If Blizzard is rebranding Battle.net...
From: Pudentame
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 01:28
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 01:28
30 lines
2580 bytes
2580 bytes
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:07:54 -0400, ImperiusDamian <damianbl...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2016-10-18 02:10, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: >> ImperiusDamian <damianbl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> True, and at least now there's an endgame other than endless Act 4/Act 5 >>> runs. (Or for that matter, cow runs a la LoD 1.09...) >> >> I went straight back to D2. D3 did nothing for me that D2 doesn't do >> better. >> > >Aside from a battle.net shared stash? ;) I don't really do battle.net. I found the ability to build a character to my taste in D3 single player mode extremely limited, and then was really disappointed when I discovered that I can only have one character build. Starting the game again with a new character wiped out my existing character. At least with D2 I could keep multiple characters & switch back & forth between them. Plus, I bought two complete sets of the basic game + expansion sets with legit product keys, so if I had to, I could take my characters to battle.net open and trade equipment between them.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3roh3cd72idkhdtmfgho5k2f2ig4687s93@4ax.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!m27ni2061qtf.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx40.iad.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<1mu9zlw.12w6k12n9ok2wN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <nshe97$h6p$1@dont-email.me> <n5720clprgmjmd30ltc1kn0gdaha76mo0f@4ax.com> <nttoak$boe$1@dont-email.me> <5802f161.605720@News.Individual.NET> <nu176p$i9a$1@dont-email.me> <1mvbwqf.knfb0l1rh5xj6N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <nurni2$fmj$1@dont-email.me>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.99.127.83 with SMTP id p19mr4746724pgn.107.1480123672997; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 17:27:52 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: alt.games.diablo@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.18.246 with SMTP id g109ls6916131otg.7.gmail; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 17:27:52 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.237.34.58 with SMTP id n55mr1961077qtc.10.1480123672687; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 17:27:52 -0800 (PST) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!m27ni2061qtf.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx40.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Pudentame <no.one@no.where.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.games.diablo Subject: Re: If Blizzard is rebranding Battle.net... Message-ID: <3roh3cd72idkhdtmfgho5k2f2ig4687s93@4ax.com> References: <1mu9zlw.12w6k12n9ok2wN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <nshe97$h6p$1@dont-email.me> <n5720clprgmjmd30ltc1kn0gdaha76mo0f@4ax.com> <nttoak$boe$1@dont-email.me> <5802f161.605720@News.Individual.NET> <nu176p$i9a$1@dont-email.me> <1mvbwqf.knfb0l1rh5xj6N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <nurni2$fmj$1@dont-email.me> User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218 MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 31 X-Complaints-To: ab...@usenetserver.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 01:27:52 UTC Organization: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 20:28:05 -0500 X-Received-Bytes: 1986 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2800554562 Bytes: 2199 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit