Re: If Blizzard is rebranding Battle.net...

Article View: alt.games.diablo

Article #544364

#544364

From: jam... Jamie Kahn Genet
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 06:10

48 lines
3231 bytes

ImperiusDamian <damianbl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2016-10-15 23:18, Ashen Shugar wrote:
> > I think it was ImperiusDamian <damianbl...@gmail.com> that
> > wrote something like...
> >
> >> On 2016-10-14 13:58, Pudentame wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:55:52 -0400, ImperiusDamian
> >>> <damianbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2016-09-27 14:39, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote:
> >>>>> ...in 'everything under the one brand - Blizzard' does that
> >>>>> mean a new Diablo 1 update? Even one that only changes some
> >>>>> graphics assets? Heh.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>><http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/09/battle-nets-name-is-changing-j
> >>>>>ust-in-time-for-its-20th-anniversary/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>>>>
> I'm hoping for higher resolutions and modern DirectX support so D1 and
> >>>> D2 can run on modern screens at higher than 640x480 and
> >>>> 800x600...
> >>>
> >>> Did y'all find D3 as big a disappointment as I did?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Enjoyable, fun in its own way... but it was NOT what I think it
> >> needed to be.
> >
> > Though with the expansion, a lot was improved.
> >
> >
> > Ashen Shugar
> >
> 
> True, and at least now there's an endgame other than endless Act 4/Act 5
> runs. (Or for that matter, cow runs a la LoD 1.09...)

I went straight back to D2. D3 did nothing for me that D2 doesn't do
better.
-- 
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1mvbwqf.knfb0l1rh5xj6N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>

Path:

mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!f59ni23498qtb.1!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail

References:

<1mu9zlw.12w6k12n9ok2wN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <nshe97$h6p$1@dont-email.me> <n5720clprgmjmd30ltc1kn0gdaha76mo0f@4ax.com> <nttoak$boe$1@dont-email.me> <5802f161.605720@News.Individual.NET> <nu176p$i9a$1@dont-email.me>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Received: by 10.107.131.28 with SMTP id f28mr7704823iod.25.1476771021637;        Mon, 17 Oct 2016 23:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: alt.games.diablo@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.157.54.247 with SMTP id s52ls14518306otd.39.gmail; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 23:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.237.41.7 with SMTP id s7mr377675qtd.44.1476771021340;        Mon, 17 Oct 2016 23:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!f59ni23498qtb.1!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: jam...@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet)
Newsgroups: alt.games.diablo
Subject: Re: If Blizzard is rebranding Battle.net...
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:10:18 +1300
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <1mvbwqf.knfb0l1rh5xj6N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>
References: <1mu9zlw.12w6k12n9ok2wN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <nshe97$h6p$1@dont-email.me> <n5720clprgmjmd30ltc1kn0gdaha76mo0f@4ax.com> <nttoak$boe$1@dont-email.me> <5802f161.605720@News.Individual.NET> <nu176p$i9a$1@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: individual.net raUOuTB7Hinod0DOzIC/rg88Ai/ayQG2a86v7XDzcE5LZuAt4L
X-Orig-Path: jamiekg
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UEHXJGWHZ/2vmHCpD4Bea0WJB7g=
X-Face: "kFFiY;\(DHi/Pmz+gFFh:dJzRy,oJip1vt]JYH4)$)mL~-QmqfJlxO{YY/m|9GYD99w'zz 0efQxtUlpGD&hnfxk@L3kj`5>qWOdW%YV=_az/4P3mYm{GzA9C`G-uEDtmXw%TR9upt3-\D\W*T^;j N?GdTWruDT2ae?.`()d)?1Qyd"ki:?HE(wO
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.4 (6da4d6e6d0) (Mac OS X version 10.11.6 (x86))
Bytes: 2648
X-Received-Bytes: 2666
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3332176165
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message