🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.diablo
Article #544065

Re: SweetSpearGirl the Champion

#544065
From: ~misfit~
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 07:27
93 lines
5378 bytes
Somewhere on teh intarwebs Someone wrote:
> "~misfit~" wrote...
>> Somewhere on teh intarwebs Someone wrote:
>>> "ImperiusDamian" wrote...
>>>> On Jun 18, 3:50 am, "~misfit~" <sore_n_ha...@nospamyahoo.com.au>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Somewhere on teh intarwebs ImperiusDamian wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ...Well, BOLLOCKS.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I permed the normal mule game as per usual, dropped the bow and
>>>>>> some gems and SSG's old spear, intending to pass them over to my
>>>>>> rune mule, and BAM! "Game Does Not Exist."
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mother-FUCKER! I was planning on upgrading that Lycander's. :(
>>>>>> *sobs*
>>>>>
>>>>> That's bloody annoying! Lycander's is something I don't see often
>>>>> either.
>>>>> You have my sympathies. (I reckon Riphook is likely better anyway
>>>>> than an
>>>>> Edge Rune bow...)
>>>>
>>>> Well I lost the bow, the Tir and it turned out I'd cubed up my
>>>> Amn's anyway, so I'm not about to find out. LOL
>>>
>>> I don't have Lycander's, but I have some other unique bows I've
>>> muled, including a Witchwild.  I also have some white Amazon bows
>>> with + bow skills, and Tir and Amn runes aplenty.  Whisper me when
>>> you see me online if you would like something.  I'd be happy to
>>> help.
>>
>> The artist formally known as Evil Bill is talking a Lycander's Flank
>> Ceremonial Pike rather than  Lycander's Aim Ceremonial Bow.
>
> Wow, you guys completely lost me...
>
> Quote: "I permed the normal mule game as per usual, dropped the bow
> and some gems..."
> Quote: "I reckon Riphook is likely better anyway than an Edge Rune
> bow..."
> So, poring over the previous messages as if they were holy writ, I now
> *think* I see that Euyfura is a Bowazon while SSG is a Spearazon, so
> that you have two different Amazon toons that are speaking to each
> other (in your head, that you're sharing with us)...  Am I on track?
>
> :-)


Damian the Imperious one filled you in on that I believe.

>> BTW good buddy, what's the ED on that Witchwild? ;-)
>>
>
> 167%

Nice. 3 off perfect. Depending on what base damage the bow rolled with it 
could be a good one.

> Although the few points difference in damage between the bottom 150
> and top 170 makes me wonder if it's that seriously important to worry
> about it.  ?

Well, when you consider that the bow has 1% Deadly Strike per clvl (and a 
Witchyzon puts several points at least into the skill) then that 150 - 170% 
range is really more like +300 - 340% ED to a high-level zon. (I've upped 
mine to a Diamond Bow too.)

> You looking to gain a point or two more damage?  I'll trade you for
> yours if mine's better.  It could be a while before I'm making a
> Bowazon.

Yeah, my (currently) Witchyzon strafer is using a 161% bow (thanks Kaytie) 
which has the sockets populated with +ED% jewels (I think maybe a 23% and a 
27%, one I had and the other courtesey of Kaytie). I was hoping to find 
another, higher ED one as they're (usually) not uncommon and use higher ED 
jewels in it or, if the rune drops are what they're cracked up to be, a 
couple of OHMs for +50% ED each.

However the runes aren't exactly raining from the sky (at least for me) so 
if I get big rune I'll likely go the Faith way. However a higher +ED WWS and 
higher +ED jewels is perhaps an option. The difference between your WWS and 
mine is only 6% though and I haven't found any higher ED jewels yet either. 
Therefore the question's moot really. If yours was 170%, I has a couple 40% 
ED jewels (or aforementioned OHMs spare) *and* you had no plans for a bowyer 
I'd consider begging it from you. As it is it's not worth it my friend, 
thanks though.
-- 
Cheers,
Shaun.

"When we dream.... that's just our brains defragmenting" G Jackson. 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <hvkft5$fi$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <811b7de0-9c57-44e5-a9d6-fabd116fbec3@i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <7b3dc402-55c1-4480-b00a-a98f4a8107f9@z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <hvf8g5$8j9$1@news.eternal-september.org> <18d7c403-baa2-4110-a853-42481d1ed529@r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4c1b8380$0$15235$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com> <hvgsar$n2j$1@news.eternal-september.org> <4c1c2455$0$22363$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "~misfit~" <sore_n_happy@nospamyahoo.com.au>
Newsgroups: alt.games.diablo2,alt.games.diablo
Subject: Re: SweetSpearGirl the Champion
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:27:27 +1200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 95
Message-ID: <hvkft5$fi$1@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <811b7de0-9c57-44e5-a9d6-fabd116fbec3@i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <7b3dc402-55c1-4480-b00a-a98f4a8107f9@z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <hvf8g5$8j9$1@news.eternal-september.org> <18d7c403-baa2-4110-a853-42481d1ed529@r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4c1b8380$0$15235$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com> <hvgsar$n2j$1@news.eternal-september.org> <4c1c2455$0$22363$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 07:27:33 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="wqhADSIGIZv1uwNgDqh9xA";  logging-data="498"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+UZCKZax5QV4KYOo6gJmgM97GD1RW8+8Q="
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100619-1, 06/20/2010), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+ch3y/sOJfpcWzYN27CYW84FBSE=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Bytes: 5275
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit