Article View: alt.games.diablo
Article #543546Re: Announcement
From: ~misfit~
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:31
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:31
42 lines
3196 bytes
3196 bytes
Somewhere on teh intarweb "EvilBill" typed: > Thanks to Shaun's generous donation of the Gemstone 1.5 files, I am > now working on doing a direct port of that version of Gemstone to D2 > 1.11b - since the 1.10 version of Gemstone didn't get out of beta, I > decided not to use that as a base. > > While Gemstone II for 1.10 added its uniques and runewords on the end > of the 1.10 files, thus screwing up the Gemstone 1.5 unique items for > 1.09 chars, I'm taking a different approach: the Gemstone items will > be inserted into the files at their old positions, thus allowing > direct loading of old Gemstone characters into the new version > without item corruption. > > This will mean vanilla LoD single-player characters who possess any of > the 1.10+ uniques and runewords will not load properly in the new > version of Gemstone - before doing so, you may want to discard or mule > any of the newer stuff! Basically, it's backwards-compatible with > Gemstone 1.5 characters and LoD 1.08 and 1.09 characters, but NOT with > LoD 1.10 or 1.11 chars. > > Phew! > > OK, OK, I'm doing this really so I can play the old SweetSpearGirl > without messing around with two D2 installs. ;) But I thought some of > you old Gemstone aficionados might appreciate it! > > Plus once the port is complete, I intend to continue updating it by > adding new items and features on a regular basis - so feel free to > jump in with your ideas for new uniques, sets and runewords ;) That would be really cool! I've never tried the 1.10 version of Gemstone (although I have it) and I still have saved files of my old 1.09 Gemstone chars too! (Although, to be honest, knowing what I know now, I'd probably re-build. Question: Will the 1.10 reliance on synergies be part of it? (In which case I''ll need to rebuild characters anyway, except maybe my strafer, who'll only loose the pierce/guided left-click attack.) Cheers, -- Shaun.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<48335f45$1@news2.actrix.gen.nz>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!ucberkeley!news-hog.berkeley.edu!203.109.252.33.MISMATCH!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news2.actrix.gen.nz!not-for-mailReferences:
<69gvtbF32p9b6U1@mid.individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: "~misfit~" <misfit61nz@hooya.com.au> Newsgroups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 References: <69gvtbF32p9b6U1@mid.individual.net> Subject: Re: Announcement Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:31:21 +1200 Lines: 44 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response NNTP-Posting-Host: 202-154-153-129.ubs-dynamic.connections.net.nz X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 202-154-153-129.ubs-dynamic.connections.net.nz Message-ID: <48335f45$1@news2.actrix.gen.nz> X-Trace: news2.actrix.gen.nz 1211326277 202.154.153.129 (21 May 2008 11:31:17 +1200) X-Original-Trace: 21 May 2008 11:31:17 +1200, 202-154-153-129.ubs-dynamic.connections.net.nz Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!198.186.194.249.MISMATCH!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!ucberkeley!news-hog.berkeley.edu!203.109.252.33.MISMATCH!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news2.actrix.gen.nz!not-for-mail Bytes: 3062 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit