Article View: alt.games.diablo
Article #542502Re: Question re: the NM FE bug
From: Amarande
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:45
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:45
33 lines
2862 bytes
2862 bytes
Jaffir wrote: > > This occures in NM games. Run the council in Act 3 NM a dozen times... you > will most likely run into it. Do it softcore though.... = D > Ahh, I recall that one now. That's more a balancing issue than a bug - IIRC what happened there was that the multiplier (basically % of max monster life) used to determine how much damage an FE explosion causes is not as well balanced on Nightmare as it is on Normal or Hell. In fact, it used to be even worse on Hell, but it got rebalanced during the 1.10 beta ... NM wasn't balanced as well or at all though, possibly because it depends quite a lot on the max HP of the particular boss concerned. Indeed it is not so noticeable with bosses that don't have much HP, unless the other behavior (interaction between multiple *E mods, and *that*, I believe, is much more likely to really be a bug, though 1.11 did not to my knowledge fix it) is involved. Else you would constantly hear about people dying to the Countess's death, or to the Grand Vizier's or Colenzo's during Chaos or Baal runs, while this doesn't seem to normally be the case; it seems to almost always be high-HP enemies like Council, Urdars, Venom Lords, Act 5 minotaurs, and probably Lister when he gets that mod where people post of losing a hardcore character. In fact the NM behavior may actually be more consistent with the original intent of the Fire Enchanted mod ... by comparison it actually seems somewhat wimpy on Hell after the rebalance, unless again the multiple-enchantment bug is involved. But it does seem to be the general opinion that it's a tad too powerful with high-HP bosses ...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<aCm0j.43$xq7.31@newsfe05.lga>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.lga!newsfe05.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<13jmfm7668o4d39@corp.supernews.com> <70M_i.4795$RR1.879@trnddc02> <13jn676ob03rdce@corp.supernews.com> <NmO_i.5290$K01.266@newsfe05.lga> <w6OdnXF_fuHGrKHanZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@insightbb.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.lga!newsfe05.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Amarande <nospam@lunasanguine.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 Subject: Re: Question re: the NM FE bug References: <13jmfm7668o4d39@corp.supernews.com> <70M_i.4795$RR1.879@trnddc02> <13jn676ob03rdce@corp.supernews.com> <NmO_i.5290$K01.266@newsfe05.lga> <w6OdnXF_fuHGrKHanZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <w6OdnXF_fuHGrKHanZ2dnUVZ_jqdnZ2d@insightbb.com> Lines: 33 Message-ID: <aCm0j.43$xq7.31@newsfe05.lga> NNTP-Posting-Host: baimnmlamcijcpglnimchhjnkalknlcf X-Trace: dbkajaeeceiapgbclbdnpiohcfhaihogibcnojmlkgpjohkfbaimnmlamcijcpglppogniagcmfbknnjbjbjlofbpbjhjfpknhmclgeflnhmocdlnamnbbfhilnfmmjmfelfojnjbfokking NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:45:58 MST Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:45:41 -0500 Bytes: 2899 X-Original-Bytes: 2856 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit