🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4a4k9r$o...@interport.net>, dar...@interport.net says...
>
>Followup-To: 
comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms
-windows.win95.setup,comp.multimedia,junk,comp.graphics.animation,alt.
>t
>References: <49kjg5$9...@taco.cc.ncsu.edu> <DIw4n...@mv.mv.com> 
<49mtjo$p...@Axil.wave.co.nz> <49qvf5$e...@news.cencom.net> 
<4a257g$bat@peabody.Colorado.ED
>Distribution: 
>
>Lawrence D'Oliveiro (l...@waikato.ac.nz) wrote:
>: In article <4a257g$b...@peabody.Colorado.EDU>,
>: jord...@rintintin.Colorado.EDU (JORDAN  SPENSER AARON) wrote:
>
>: >1. About a month ago I heard rumors about the next version of 
Windows 
>: >95.  Has anyone here heard anything about it?
>
>: With sales of Windows 95 running at 50% or more below expectations, 
it
>: looks like it's a dead-end product.
>
>I don't think so SPUD!
>-- 
>----
>Darrin Rodriguez
>Weird World Wide Web Pages
>http://www.interport.net/~darcom/

The "rumor" of a win 96 beta is true.  in fact I have a copy of it.  It
is pretty much the same as win 95 but all of the bugs are fixed

ws.win95.setup,comp.multimedia,junk,comp.graphics.animation,alt.games.doom,alt..games..descent,alt..games..warcraft,comp..graphics,comp..graphics..animation,alt..fan..bill-ga

>: With sales of Windows 95 running at 50% or more below expectations, it
>: looks like it's a dead-end product.

>I don't think so SPUD!
 
Yes their will be a Windows 96...due out in Fall of 96....have a
friend works at Microsoft....  :)

In article <4aclkt$7...@dub-news-svc-2.compuserve.com>, 
Here.o...@somewhere.com says...
>
>ws.win95.setup,comp.multimedia,junk,comp.graphics.animation,alt.games.d
oom,alt..games..descent,alt..games..warcraft,comp..graphics,comp..gra
>
>>: With sales of Windows 95 running at 50% or more below expectations, 
it
>>: looks like it's a dead-end product.
>
>>I don't think so SPUD!
> 
>Yes their will be a Windows 96...due out in Fall of 96....have a
>friend works at Microsoft....  :)
>
>Since you don't work for Microsoft what make you think sales are 
DOWN?!?!?!?
Check out the pathetic OS/2 sales figuires if you want to see a bomb!

dar...@interport.net (DARCOM'S WEIRD WORLD WIDE WEB) wrote:

>Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.multimedia,junk,comp.graphics.animation,alt.games.doom,alt.games.descent,alt.games.warcraft,comp.graphics,comp.graphics.animation,alt.fan.bill-ga
>t
>References: <49kjg5$9...@taco.cc.ncsu.edu> <DIw4n...@mv.mv.com> <49mtjo$p...@Axil.wave.co.nz> <49qvf5$e...@news.cencom.net> <4a257g$b...@peabody.Colorado.EDU> <ldo-061295...@130.217.96.144>
>Distribution: 

>Lawrence D'Oliveiro (l...@waikato.ac.nz) wrote:
>: In article <4a257g$b...@peabody.Colorado.EDU>,
>: jord...@rintintin.Colorado.EDU (JORDAN  SPENSER AARON) wrote:

>: >1. About a month ago I heard rumors about the next version of Windows 
>: >95.  Has anyone here heard anything about it?

>: With sales of Windows 95 running at 50% or more below expectations, it
>: looks like it's a dead-end product.

>I don't think so SPUD!
>-- 
>----
>Darrin Rodriguez
>Weird World Wide Web Pages
>http://www.interport.net/~darcom/

	Win95 is best.


                                          Alan