🚀 go-pugleaf

STOP ALL THIS SPAMMING  NOW. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THESE
NEWSGROUPS.

On Sun, 17 Aug 1997 16:20:12 GMT, big_bad@mindspring..com (Big Bad
Wolf) wrote:

>On Sun, 17 Aug 1997 06:25:29 -0400, John Bibeau
><jbi...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>Big Bad Wolf wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 Aug 97 20:55:11 GMT, "Josh Straub"
>>> <took...@nconnect.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> it. I sencerly hope that one of you bastards ignore that
>>> TRESSPASSERS
>>> >> WILL BE SHOT ON SIGHT sign in my yard, and then try to claim
>>> "I wasn't
>>> >> stealing anything, so why did you shoot me?" Ooooo.......it
>>> >> just........just makes me tingle all over.
>>> >
>>> >Heh i would like to see a case like this.  No damn lawyers
>>> could argue with
>>> >this one.
>>>
>>> actually - in about half of the states in the US you are guilty
>>> of
>>> murder if you shoot someone EVEN IF they are stealing on your
>>> property. seems the lawyers were able to argue it after
>>> all..........
>>>
>>
>>Not necessarily.  If the person is in your home, you have every
>>right to defend yourself.  If the person is outside of your home,
>>you can get around that law if you can prove you were in bodily
>>harm from the perpetrator and reacted in self defense.
>>
>>WarGhoul
> what you are saying here is a function of state law and does not
>apply universally.  many peole hold the belief that they have the
>right you are speaking of but they hold that belief in error.
>the facts remain that in a large number of states you would be in
>error. maybe you live in a state where you are right- maybe you dont.
>if you live in my state you dont have that right.
>
>
>BBW