🚀 go-pugleaf

My pal Rico Laguna said:

>Apparrently XXXX the "Monster" Stock that went public 2 days ago has
>been making headlines all over the world.......It had a smashing
>volume success of a little over 3 million trades for its open.
>Finishing the day  at 14 1/2 with a  2  gain from its opening at 12
>1/2 . 
>  But for some strange reason the stock volume the following day was
>oddly low at only 500,000 transactions and it actually closed the day
>down   1/4 point to 14 1/4
>
>The Wall Street Journal posted a big artical of INACCURATE yearly
>revenue's , earnings and profits of which adversley affected the stock
>movement!
>Look for XXXX to bounce back big today and next week with the
>retraction of the Wall Street Journal Statements in their paper also
>followed by a big apology and posting of XXXX's CORRECT earnings!!
>
>This stock will soar.............LOOK OUT! 

Does anybody else suspect this spam is the work of a slimeball hoping to
unethically influence the market value of a particular stock for personal
gain?  Me too.

Cheers, Todd
---
I'm an optimist: the glass is empty, but maybe =someday= it'll be half full.