🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.descent
Article #89275

Re: isnt descent 2 (singleplayer) a funner game than descent3?

#89275
From: rms
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 00:21
22 lines
2608 bytes
>> What were the reviews like?

    There's nothing horrible about D3, and the story is certainly more 
substantive than the earlier games.

    Gameplay-wise, I've been playing it on this very fast modern system at 
1600x1200 (with my standard mouse+keyboard config), and the controls are 
very twitchy and aiming is difficult.  I blame the mouse driver code more 
than anything, as proper acceleration curves aren't easy to set up so you 
get precision with small movements while not requiring much lifting of the 
mouse for big turns.  I had this well-adjusted back in the day with 
command-line DOS mouse driver parameters and the 3dfx version of D2, but oh 
well.

   Modern FPS games have superior mouse code, but the Descent developers 
never really gave respect to mousers, not even bothering to fix the 
framerate issue in either D1 or D2; all their effort went into pleasing 
stick users.  Oh well, sometimes trying different mice can help, I'm 
thinking of getting the MX1000 for my next mouse, if they make a tailed 
version :)  This Explorer4 is ok, but does have glaring flaws.

rms 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <XFupd.24187$Rf1.19975@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!prodigy.com!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr19.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!087337b2!not-for-mail
References: <17a90d11.0411220924.53694c9a@posting.google.com> <41a3ada9$0$3671$ba620dc5@nova.planet.nl> <ra%od.385877$wV.179486@attbi_s54> <41a646b6$0$3673$ba620dc5@nova.planet.nl>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!prodigy.com!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr19.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!087337b2!not-for-mail
From: "rms" <rsquires@flashREMOVE.net>
Newsgroups: alt.games.descent
References: <17a90d11.0411220924.53694c9a@posting.google.com> <41a3ada9$0$3671$ba620dc5@nova.planet.nl> <ra%od.385877$wV.179486@attbi_s54> <41a646b6$0$3673$ba620dc5@nova.planet.nl>
Subject: Re: isnt descent 2 (singleplayer) a funner game than descent3?
Lines: 24
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Message-ID: <XFupd.24187$Rf1.19975@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.240.117.99
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr19.news.prodigy.com 1101428471 ST000 4.240.117.99 (Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:21:11 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:21:11 EST
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
X-UserInfo1: TSUGGWKGDJSAB_\Y]BCHOPP@FJ^ZTB\MV@BT]_MIJQR@EPIB_VUKAH_[MTX\IS[K[NGYJJFNOFZR_G[BUNTAOQLFE^TEHRPI]PZZRP_BMDSFQFL_]CBHXRWCMDCUZAZN@D_AKMNLEI]MWHCSXL^]NNC__CZFGSGHYYXWPFG@SCAVA]\FT\@B\RDGENSUQS^M
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 00:21:11 GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit