🚀 go-pugleaf

"Stealthy J." <stealthpc@westnetSUXORZ.com.au> wrote in message news:<3ff3881a@quokka.wn.com.au>...
> Why be sorry about top posting folks? Its all I ever do! *grins*
> 
> Now, as for you satan. Do you honestly think we care what you think? Seems
> to me you're just a boy dealing with puberty. We really dont give a flying
> fuck through a rolling donut what your opinions are, because thats all they
> are- Opinions. They mean nothing to us, they are insignificant, they are
> petty and juvenile. You should go and have some anger management therapy, I
> think you need it. Why dont you go and bitch to your mother or something,
> she will probably care more than us. Maybe she can get you a refund "my son
> says this game sucks, now give me a refund" ""Uhh, sure. SECURITY""

Imbecile, as I have said, the posting is not aimed to individuals like
you, it
is aimed to individuals considering buying EA games that what to be
able to make an informed decision. When you will be able to prove my
bitching wrong and
unfounded, then I will stop the postings, but you cannot do so,
cretin, thus, shut the fuck up.
Cretin, address the issues raised with respect to the game's
performance are they wrong and unfounded? Be prepared to backup your
statements.

Tell us imbecile, is the game not freezing from time to time?

Tell us imbecile, is the online performance of the game satisfactory
when Electronic Arts has made the point in acknowledging that "Online
experience may change" and to translate it for you imbecile, means
"Online performance of the game is crap".

Tell us imbecile, through how many splash screens you have to go in
order to play the game?

Tell us imbecile, upon exiting the game, does it leave crap in the
memory or not?

Tell us imbecile, how GameSpy borders on individual's privacy?

As I have said, address the issues or shut the fuck up.



> 
> You are nothing, and nothing gives you the right to drag names through the
> mud. Look at Microsoft, look at Symantec. Microsoft railroad you into shit
> you dont want, and Norton Util's just takes over your whole damn puter. But
> that is just what I think of them, thats MY opinion. Just because ppl dont
> agree with you, it does NOT give you the right to go off even more about
> something you dislike. You are purely speaking from a biased point of view
> because the game "isnt running the way you think it should run"
> Well here's some free advice fuckstain. Go work for EA. See if you can do
> any better.
> 
> Tard.

I have earned the right to bitch and complain about the Generals and
Zero Hour the very moment I have received the receipt for the purchase
of the shittiest game ever put on the market - C&C Generals and C&C
Generals:Zero Hour.

The fact that Electronic Arts put a shit product on the market, and
hope to get away with it, that is another matter, EA has ignored all
customer's complaints, ignored the feedback that it received by e-mail
and the rest, EA has made a choice, and apparently it was the wrong
one, and I will not let them get away with it.

Now as far as I am concerned with respect to go working for EA, first
and foremost Electronic Arts will have to stop making chief designers
and chief programmers out of dickheads and imbeciles, then I will
consider it.


> 
> 
> --
> The J.
> 
> I like stuff, do you like stuff?
> ,,|,, (^_^) ,,|,,
> 
> 
> PS: To the true WW and C&C fans out there: I hear ya, and I'm in with you
> all.
> 
> Remove SUXORZ to email.
> "satan" <vally1234@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:139ab587.0312291912.608b9ae0@posting.google.com...
> > "Dr.Seuss" <dr.seuss@thecatinthehat99.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
>  news:<bspvlv$g2l$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk>...
> > > I've been playing C&C since the very first game years back (what is it,
>  ten
> > > years now?) and have bought every game almost on the first day of
>  release
> > > since then, every single game and expansion disk. I have enjoyed all of
> > > them, turning to them for an hour or two's gaming whenever at a  loose
>  end
> > > and always enjoying the challenge of the game and the differing gameplay
> > > each time.
> > >
> > >  Generals is in my opinion the pinnacle of the game, C&C has evolved
>  into
> > > the current offering and is everything I wanted it to be. Yes
>  occasionally I
> > > do get a slow down online but it always clears after a few seconds and
>  many
> > > times I've reconnected and found the lag glitch gone completely. I'm no
> > > techy, I don't know what causes it but I really don't care, I paid my
>  money
> > > I play the game and I really rate Generals and Zero Hour as brilliant
> > > entertainment for the money spent. I don't have anything else that has
> > > provided such a good return on investmemt, DVD's / Videos etc, watch
>  them
> > > once or twice and they're as good as dead. This game has probably cost a
> > > minute fraction of a penny per hour that I've played and is excellent
>  value.
> > >
> >
> >  The government department which you are refering to is a consumer
> > watchdog.
> > As I have said, there will be idiots which will buy the game no matter
> > what, the fact of the matter is that while the game "line" might have
> > some originality, the performance of the product is what the posting
> > is about, like any other product it can have a good and nice package
> > but if the performace is shit,  then that product is junk, simple,
> > which is what Generals and Zero Hour games are shit products due to
> > the fact that they do not perform to the consumer's satisfaction and
> > cause problems, which none of you imbeciles, have cared to address,
> > thus, enforcing the accuracy of the original posting.
> >
> > What I realy want is to get value for my money, and up to this point I
> > am still waiting, because, come New Year, there will be making a
> > posting a day regarding the shitty performance of the Generals and
> > Zero Hour, until I get my money back or they fix the games as such
> > that the online performance improves, better user interface and the
> > rest, because, bro, I PROMISE YOU THIS, if they do not fix it, as such
> > that I am satisfied with the product or give me the money back, 2004
> > will be the year in which Electronic Arts will go under, Generals and
> > Zero Hour are not the only games that are causing problems, do not
> > forget about the rest of the crap Electronic Arts puts on the market.
> >
> > Let Electronic Arts prove me wrong with the statements that I have
> > made and show to contrary, here is a challange for Electronic Arts,
> > because every statement that I have made is a FACT that none of you
> > have been able to deny it.
> >
> >
> > >  I know you are only trolling, who knows why, who cares really. If you
>  don't
> > > like EA / Generals / Zero Hour / Gamespy then simple, don't support,
>  don't
> > > buy, don't use. I don't think anyone on these newsgroups is interested
>  in
> > > some rumour you've picked up about some government department who has
> > > nothing better to do than investigate a computer game. Also, keep the
> > > accusations of Liar to yourself, we don't all have some old computer
>  that
> > > struggles with the game, mine eats the game with all options and
>  settings
> > > running at full, no slow down, no memory block, no problems.
> > >
> > >  I will continue to buy from EA, I will continue to buy C&C, Red Alert
> > > whatever and I will continue to enjoy the finest games I've played over
>  the
> > > last 15 years on a PC.
> > >
> > >  Have a g'day
> > >
> > >  Doc
> > >
> > > PS       Sorry about the top post
> > > PPS     No I don't work for EA or Gamespy either
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "satan" <vally1234@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:139ab587.0312281830.124f94e7@posting.google.com...
> > > > First of all you three imbecils will have to disclose your association
> > > > with Electronic Arts and GameSpy network if you want your comments to
> > > > have any credibility at all.
> > > >
> > > > Now, let Electronic Arts put another faulty product on the market,
> > > > because in Australia we have something called ACCC (Australian
> > > > Competition and Consumer Commision), because we can deal with
> > > > Electronic Arts in this way, it goes under faulty and unsatisfactory
> > > > products.
> > > >
> > > > My understanding is that Electronic Arts is already in the ACCC's
> > > > sights, this is what I was told.
> > > >
> > > > What are you three saying, that you did not have problems with
> > > > Generals and Zero Hour? Then this is an outright LIE, just look at the
> > > > number of patches released by Electronic Arts.
> > > > What are you saying that the game never slowed to less than a frame
> > > > per second, because if you do, then this is another LIE.
> > > >
> > > > Are you saying that after you quit the game does not leave "garbage"
> > > > in the memory, because if you do, then this is another LIE.
> > > >
> > > > Are you saying that the user interface is not crap, because if you do,
> > > > then is another LIE.
> > > >
> > > > Are you by any chanced suggesting that there are no problems with the
> > > > online game performance when Electronic Arts has acknowledged the fact
> > > > that due to poor development practices they did not take into account
> > > > the internet infrastructure, then again you three are telling LIES.
> > > >
> > > > Electronic Arts has added the "quickstart" option at the executable
> > > > due to the fact that individuals complained about it.
> > > >
> > > > There will be idiots that will buy the crap no matter what, but by far
> > > > the majority of individuals will display more common sense and
> > > > consider the recent performance of the products put on the market by
> > > > Electronic Arts and make an informed decision.
> > > >
> > > > As I have said, try before you buy, if does not have the online
> > > > capability in the trial version, dropped like a hot potato, because
> > > > the online version of the game is crap.
> > > > As I have said, if anywhere on the package is mentioned the word
> > > > GameSpy, again dropped like a hot potato, because the online
> > > > capabilities of the game are crap.
> > > >
> > > > If you have to go throught more than two screens to play any feature
> > > > of the game again, dropped like a hot potato, because they are using
> > > > flashy splash screens to cover up for the poor performance of the
> > > > product.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Drinkenstein" <vodka@beer.net> wrote in message
>  news:<vutck3ptnmak93@corp.supernews.com>...
> > > > > >if red alert 3 comes out I will most definately buy it because all
>  c&c
> > > > > games are great.<
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Anonymous Alcoholic! Drink 24:7
> > > > >   Copyright © 2003 Drinkenstein
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Margolis" <someone@somewhere.org> wrote in message
> > > > > news:vutbj253rjdnd2@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > > > "satan" <vally1234@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:139ab587.0312271758.88b9bfa@posting.google.com...
> > > > > > > Soon Electronic Arts will try to put on the maket a new version
>  of
> > > > > > > Command And Conquer: Red Alert 3.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As a owner of the bullshit games, Generals and Zero Hour it is
> > > > > > > advisable
> > > > > > > that before you buy any more shitty games put on the market by
> > > > > > > Electronic Arts, try to get a playable demo with online
>  capability,
> > > > > > > and if you are satisfied with the overall performance of the
>  product
> > > > > > > then and only then you should consider buying the game.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What you should look for, memory leaks, game performance when
>  there
>  is
> > > > > > > a multitude of units on the map, user interface, balance between
> > > > > > > units, you name it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If there is mentioned anywhere on the package the word GameSpy,
>  my
> > > > > > > advice is to stay away from it, because the online version of
>  the
>  game
> > > > > > > will be very, very slow.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if red alert 3 comes out I will most definately buy it because all
>  c&c
>  games
> > > > > > are great.  And if it uses gamespy, all the better.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Margolis
> > > > > >
> > > > > >