Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer
Article #892Re: C&C 2 or should I say MECH WARRIOR 2! Ha!
From: Guy Vegoda
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:00
78 lines
3833 bytes
3833 bytes
In article <vCvsrCAa...@ndmack.demon.co.uk>, David Mackintosh
<da...@ndmack.demon.co.uk> writes
>In article <8289219...@farabyss.demon.co.uk>, Distant
><Dis...@farabyss.demon.co.uk> writes
>>Greatings
>>
>> A while ago, a great game came out called Command and Conquer. A game
>>full of frills and spills. At the same time, ruffly, another cool
>>games aroses, called Mech Warrior 2. Both seemed big hits, and C&C got
>>awards for its efforts.
>>
>> Well, now all the hype is over for C&C, the makers have decided to
>>make a sequal. "Harray", we all cry, "Another great game!" But as most
>>of us have seen from the end of C&C and other screen shots, that the
>>new.....C&C 2, is somewhat different to the first. I think to myself,
>>'why would they break up such a sure wining formular, as C&C?' well,
>>the reason is, is that they can't be bothered to come up with any
>>other idea's! So, they think, "What was another good sort of game,
>>that will appeal to people? I know, Mech Warrior 2! Yes thats it!"
>>
>> And it went on from there. I hate to say this, but from what I have
>>seen of C&C 2, that it is the same as MW 2, but with a the C&C style
>>cut sceens, story line, and theme.
>>
>> So, what do we have to expect. Will C&C 2 be a rip off from MW2. or
>>will it be different? Who knows at the time, apart from Westwood! We
>>can only hope! But as I have said, it looks just the BLOODY SAME!
>>ARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!! Sorry!
>>
>>
>> *LONG LIVE THE EMPIRE*
>> \\|//
>> =GN ( ) Distant======
>> //|\\
>> ______________________________
>>| Distant - Wren inc. '96 |
>>| dis...@farabyss.demon.co.uk |
>>| IRC - Undernet: #Scumm_Bar |
>>|CMDR/GN Distant/Cehth/Base Sov|
>>| CMDR Night/Hawk/JW/VSD Decp. |
>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>
>
>I do not work for Westwood or anyone like that - so do not flame me if I am
>wrong, but the "mechwarrior" you saw was only a cutscene from c&c2. One of the
>new units will be a mech suit (so I have been told). I think that c&c2 will be
>mostly the same idea as c&c.
> By the way, if Westwood could come up with a mechwarrior style game with
>graphics as good as the ones we saw at the end of c&c - people would probabbly
>need something around 300mhz to run it at a acceptable speed.
>
Look, red alert is in Dune 2 style, so why shouldn't C&C2? You get loads
of video footage of tanks and stuff in the game, so unless you think
that we are suddenly going to get a real time rendered game, why the
hell should anybody think it will be any different? I don't know! It's
like saying that a pentium motherboard is actully the size of an
airfiled and has a large plane on it - because the advert said so! Geez!
Guy Vegoda | "Hell is an eternity in a room with your
| friends"
g...@vegoda.demon.co.uk | - Jean-Paul Satre
|
10056...@compuserve.com | "Yeah, but all his mates were French!"
| - David Lister
0181-445-2523 evening |
Turnpike evaluation. For information, see http://www.turnpike.com/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<qNUplLAHZWbxEwha@vegoda.demon.co.uk>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<828921902.9190@farabyss.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Guy Vegoda <ma...@vegoda.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: C&C 2 or should I say MECH WARRIOR 2! Ha! Date: 1996/04/11 Message-ID: <qNUplLAHZWbxEwha@vegoda.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 146978866 distribution: world x-nntp-posting-host: vegoda.demon.co.uk references: <828921902.9190@farabyss.demon.co.uk> organization: Vegoda & Co. Ltd. mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: alt.games.command.and.conquer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit