Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer
Article #890Re: C&C 2 or should I say MECH WARRIOR 2! Ha!
From: David Mackintosh
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1996 00:00
53 lines
2780 bytes
2780 bytes
In article <8289219...@farabyss.demon.co.uk>, Distant <Dis...@farabyss.demon.co.uk> writes >Greatings > > A while ago, a great game came out called Command and Conquer. A game >full of frills and spills. At the same time, ruffly, another cool >games aroses, called Mech Warrior 2. Both seemed big hits, and C&C got >awards for its efforts. > > Well, now all the hype is over for C&C, the makers have decided to >make a sequal. "Harray", we all cry, "Another great game!" But as most >of us have seen from the end of C&C and other screen shots, that the >new.....C&C 2, is somewhat different to the first. I think to myself, >'why would they break up such a sure wining formular, as C&C?' well, >the reason is, is that they can't be bothered to come up with any >other idea's! So, they think, "What was another good sort of game, >that will appeal to people? I know, Mech Warrior 2! Yes thats it!" > > And it went on from there. I hate to say this, but from what I have >seen of C&C 2, that it is the same as MW 2, but with a the C&C style >cut sceens, story line, and theme. > > So, what do we have to expect. Will C&C 2 be a rip off from MW2. or >will it be different? Who knows at the time, apart from Westwood! We >can only hope! But as I have said, it looks just the BLOODY SAME! >ARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!! Sorry! > > > *LONG LIVE THE EMPIRE* > \\|// > =GN ( ) Distant====== > //|\\ > ______________________________ >| Distant - Wren inc. '96 | >| dis...@farabyss.demon.co.uk | >| IRC - Undernet: #Scumm_Bar | >|CMDR/GN Distant/Cehth/Base Sov| >| CMDR Night/Hawk/JW/VSD Decp. | >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > I do not work for Westwood or anyone like that - so do not flame me if I am wrong, but the "mechwarrior" you saw was only a cutscene from c&c2. One of the new units will be a mech suit (so I have been told). I think that c&c2 will be mostly the same idea as c&c. By the way, if Westwood could come up with a mechwarrior style game with graphics as good as the ones we saw at the end of c&c - people would probabbly need something around 300mhz to run it at a acceptable speed. -- David Mackintosh Clwyd, Wales
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<vCvsrCAaTRaxEwYn@ndmack.demon.co.uk>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<828921902.9190@farabyss.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: David Mackintosh <da...@ndmack.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: C&C 2 or should I say MECH WARRIOR 2! Ha! Date: 1996/04/08 Message-ID: <vCvsrCAaTRaxEwYn@ndmack.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 146360047 distribution: world x-nntp-posting-host: ndmack.demon.co.uk references: <828921902.9190@farabyss.demon.co.uk> organization: Mackintosh Consultants mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: alt.games.command.and.conquer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit