Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer
Article #28014ATTN: Kali users (was Re: Proposal: alt.kali or alt.games.kali !!)
From: Raphael... Raphael Quinet
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 00:00
48 lines
3568 bytes
3568 bytes
[followups should go to alt.config only] In article <4lb9pr$j...@airnews.iadfw.net>, scre...@airmail.net writes: |> tr...@oz.net (Troy Davis) wrote: |> >Definately no need for two groups, but alt.games.kali or |> >comp.games.kali would be cool. Groups in the comp.* hierarchy take |> >longer to create but have way (2 or 3X greater) propagation then alt.* |> >groups... |> I use kali95, and I feel that there only needs to be one group. Note to all Kali users who are showing their support for a Kali newsgroup: there is no "vote" for alt.* groups, so it doesn't make any sense to post dozens of articles saying that you "vote" for alt.games.kali or whatever. It seems that most of the people who show their support for the newsgroup don't know how groups are created in the alt.* hierarchy or in the other hierarchies. Posting more and more articles showing your support for a Kali newsgroup could have the reverse effect: some news administrators could get upset by the large number of clueless articles and decide to drop that newsgroup. What we really need is a well-written proposal which describes why the group is needed, what kind of articles will be posted in it, etc. We need a good charter for the group. If you want to know how to justify the creation of an alt.* newsgroup, you should read the following WWW page: http://www.tezcat.com/~haz1/alt/faqindex.html You might also consider creating the group in another hierarchy than alt.*. Creating the group in comp.* or rec.* would have the advantage of a (much) better propagation for the newsgroup, thus allowing more Kali users to share information and talk about Kali. The newsgroup could be created under comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.* or rec.games.computer.*. If you want to create a group in these hierarchies, you have to write a Request For Discussion (RFD) and the group will have to pass the Usenet vote (yes, you will have to vote, then!). For more information, take a look in the newsgroup news.announce.newgroups or read the articles in this directory: ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet-by-group/news.answers/usenet/creating-newsgroups/ Please take the discussion to alt.config only, or news.groups if you want to create the group in one of the Big 8 hierarchies (recommended for a better propagation). -Raphael -- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | WWW: http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~quinet | | E-mail: Raphael...@eed.ericsson.se or qui...@montefiore.ulg.ac.be | | S-mail: Raphael Quinet, 9 rue des Martyrs, 4550 Nandrin (Belgium) | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4lgn8l$o4@erinews.ericsson.se>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<317759B9.72D3@gbgreg.kommunalforbund.se> <3177da68.4188149@news.earthlink.net> <4l9rc6$f2e@emerald.oz.net> <4lb9pr$jn3@airnews.iadfw.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Raphael...@eed.ericsson.se (Raphael Quinet) Subject: ATTN: Kali users (was Re: Proposal: alt.kali or alt.games.kali !!) Date: 1996/04/22 Message-ID: <4lgn8l$o4@erinews.ericsson.se> X-Deja-AN: 150844589 sender: eed...@eed.ericsson.se (Raphael Quinet) references: <317759B9.72D3@gbgreg.kommunalforbund.se> <3177da68.4188149@news.earthlink.net> <4l9rc6$f2e@emerald.oz.net> <4lb9pr$jn3@airnews.iadfw.net> followup-to: alt.config organization: Ericsson Eurolab Deutschland GmbH newsgroups: alt.config,alt.games,alt.games.descent,alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.command-n-conq,alt.games.command.and.conquer,alt.games.mechwarrior2,alt.games.mk.mk3,alt.net.and.modem.games,alt.netgames,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit