Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer
Article #27254Re: Very Slow, Questions
From: Neil Adamson
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:06
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:06
42 lines
3261 bytes
3261 bytes
"Ching Chong China Man" <no@spam.com> wrote in message news:406cccad$0$20085$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > Yeah, I have the exact problem after upgrading from w2k to wxp, downgrade to > w2k if you can, it's faster. Otherwise, try upgrading to directx9b, > downgrading ur nvidia drivers if u already updated them to the newest > version, and turn off ur flashy gui for wxp and that should give u some > extra fps. > > Is that PCI Express? if so, wow, I want one!! > > HTH 1. If you consider downgrading to 2000, don't do anything until you have run the hardware compatibility check beforehand. I considered upping from 98 to 2000 rather than XP, discounted the results of the compatibility check and the upgrade completely and utterly destroyed my machine at the operating system level, as most of the hardware was incompatible with 2000 (no drivers usually). I got XP an installed it, and XP had drivers for everything, and was sweet. 2. I must admit the spec of the machine sounds okay apart from a PCI graphics card. Sure it was Generals whose blurb said that PCI cards were NOT appropriate (might have been Call of Cuty, but I don't think so as CoD has never given me any impression of struggling with graphics). However, since then I read an article which states that improvements to PCI graphics means that upcoming new PCI graphics cards will in their turn blow away AGP graphics cards away for performance as PCI technology has rocketed ahead of AGP. 3. When I upgraded my machine, I moved from a GeForce 2 MX4 64MB graphics card to a GeForce 4 ATI 64MB(IIRC). That alone made all the difference as the MX chipset is hopelessly out of date. Better mobo, doubling the RAM from 256 to 512MB and upping the processor from AMD1200 to 2000+ gave me a machine more than capable of handling Generals and ZH (though I recently discovered, while revisiting the campaigns whilst awaiting a replacement for a router with fried EEPROM that on the final mission of each campaign, the extra work is just about at the limit). Hope it helps. Neil A
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<c4jae7$4n5e$1@sp15en20.hursley.ibm.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!chiapp19.algx.com!allegiance!nntp.abs.net!ash.uu.net!an02.austin.ibm.com!ausnews.austin.ibm.com!sp15ce20.hursley.ibm.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<406c547f_1@news.athenanews.com> <406cccad$0$20085$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!chiapp19.algx.com!allegiance!nntp.abs.net!ash.uu.net!an02.austin.ibm.com!ausnews.austin.ibm.com!sp15ce20.hursley.ibm.com!not-for-mail From: "Neil Adamson" <adamson@uk.ibm.com> Newsgroups: alt.games.command.and.conquer Subject: Re: Very Slow, Questions Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:06:20 +0100 Organization: IBM Hursley Lines: 44 Message-ID: <c4jae7$4n5e$1@sp15en20.hursley.ibm.com> References: <406c547f_1@news.athenanews.com> <406cccad$0$20085$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-9-20-228-163.hursley.ibm.com X-Trace: sp15en20.hursley.ibm.com 1080896775 154798 9.20.228.163 (2 Apr 2004 09:06:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@hursley.ibm.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 09:06:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit