Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer
Article #26612Re: Tiberian dawn - alternate NOD ending?
From: TCipollina
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 17:45
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 17:45
41 lines
2893 bytes
2893 bytes
"The Arcane Chas" <Chas@the-arcane.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:u+MOJWAmXUi$Ewyf@the-arcane.demon.co.uk... > In article <vohit7a14ajq08@corp.supernews.com>, but only after serious > contemplation, Mr. Brian Allen <blah@blah.com> put finger to keyboard > and produced the following; > >I watched both GDI endings. Sweet stuff. The Ion cannon ending rules. > >Anyways, I heard that there is also an alternate NOD ending that depends > >upon collecting nuclear parts. Any info, guys? > > Originally, you were only able to use a nuclear missile in the final > mission if you had collected all the nuclear components. This was > "fixed" in one of the patches. > > IIRC there is no alternative NOD ending - but I'd be happy to be proved > wrong. ;-} > Maybe it is in the definition of "ending" we think of video endings but maybe they meant 'game play' ending with collection of all parts, you can use a nuke weapon. if not, you cannot use it. (as Doug so correctly and intelligently noted, this was fixed with a patch in the DOS version, and the Win95 version (aka Gold) didnt require the collection at all. What i don't know is, under the oldest DOS, before the patch, what was the ending video if you didnt get the crates, since you couldn't pick the city to nuke? or maybe it didnt matter, you still got the same ending video? Here is a thought! (rare as they are) Doug, get a copy of the old pre-patched DOS and dont get the crates and see what happens! BTW, since there are 4 cities to chose, i wonder if it is worth saving the game at the end, and going back 3 times and picking each city in their turn? just another odd thought -- Fight Win Prevail But Never Cheat
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Eqgib.16035$Sc7.15227@twister.nyroc.rr.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news5.aus1.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!216.218.192.242!news.he.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!diablo.voicenet.com!24.24.2.170.MISMATCH!news-rtr.nyroc.rr.com!news-out.nyroc.rr.com!twister.nyroc.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<vohit7a14ajq08@corp.supernews.com> <u+MOJWAmXUi$Ewyf@the-arcane.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news5.aus1.giganews.com!firehose2!nntp4!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!216.218.192.242!news.he.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!diablo.voicenet.com!24.24.2.170.MISMATCH!news-rtr.nyroc.rr.com!news-out.nyroc.rr.com!twister.nyroc.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "TCipollina" <joesdad@stny.rr.com> Newsgroups: alt.games.command.and.conquer References: <vohit7a14ajq08@corp.supernews.com> <u+MOJWAmXUi$Ewyf@the-arcane.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Tiberian dawn - alternate NOD ending? Lines: 43 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: <Eqgib.16035$Sc7.15227@twister.nyroc.rr.com> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 17:45:08 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.95.142.11 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1065980708 24.95.142.11 (Sun, 12 Oct 2003 13:45:08 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 13:45:08 EDT Organization: Road Runner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit