Re: Command_and_Conquer

Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer

Article #17318

Back to alt.games.command.and.conquer Previous Next

#17318

From: Olaf van der Spek
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 00:00

26 lines
1563 bytes

Jodo Kast heeft geschreven in bericht
<36bf8329$0$16...@nntp1.ba.best.com>...
>Ron Ablang wrote in message <79nide$o...@news.csus.edu>...
>>From: "Alexander \"Alex\" Kriz" <alexander.kriz @ gte.net>
>
>
>>3.GDI's Advanced gaurd tower is much better than
>>Nod's turret.I have many more reasons but that is all I have time to put
>down.
>
>
>you forgot that gun turrets are the tech equivalent of the regular guard
>tower- w/the crappy machine gun- the advanced guard tower does take less

Crappy machine gun? It's quite good, especially as help against infantry.

>power than it's NOD equivalent, but the obelisk of light (tower of light?
>obelisk of nod? tower of nod? umm...) is ALOT more powerful- gdi defensive
>buildings are better against infantry, and nod defensive buildings are
>better against vehicles.
>
And gdi attack is better against armor while nod attack is better against
infantry/no-armor.

>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <79ppj7$ukb$2@beast.euro.net>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <79nide$orf@news.csus.edu> <36bf8329$0$16690@nntp1.ba.best.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: "Olaf van der Spek" <Sp...@EuroNet.NL>
Subject: Re: Command_and_Conquer
Date: 1999/02/09
Message-ID: <79ppj7$ukb$2@beast.euro.net>
X-Deja-AN: 442464298
References: <79nide$orf@news.csus.edu> <36bf8329$0$16690@nntp1.ba.best.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
X-Complaints-To: ab...@euronet.nl
X-Trace: beast.euro.net 918579623 31371 194.134.8.235 (9 Feb 1999 17:00:23 GMT)
Organization: EuroNet Internet
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Feb 1999 17:00:23 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.games.command.and.conquer
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message