Thread View: alt.games.command-n-conq
28 messages
28 total messages
Started by Sigbjørn Lund Olsen
Tue, 06 Mar 2001 07:18
UFAQ
Author: Sigbjørn Lund Olsen
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 07:18
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 07:18
251 lines
10659 bytes
10659 bytes
Unified FAQ =========== For: o alt.games.command-n-conq o alt.games.command.and.conquer o alt.games.redalert o alt.games.command-n-conq.red-alert o alt.games.tiberian-sun o alt.games.redalert2 By: o Matt (Dark Samurai) o Stevie Kay o Sigbj�rn Lund Olsen (e...@adjective-army.com) o Brian Garcia o Dave Downs (da...@adjective-army.com) Maintainer: o Sigbj�rn Lund Olsen (e...@adjective-army.com) Last updated: o 6th January 2001 Table of Contents ================= 1 - Introducion 1.1 - Unified FAQ 1.2 - Group-specific FAQs 2 - Newsgroup Guidelines 2.1 - Posting 101 2.2 - Newbies 2.3 - Trolls 2.4 - Flames 2.5 - On-Topic / Off-Topic 2.6 - Top Posting 2.7 - HTML 2.8 - Binaries 2.9 - Signatures 2.10 - Spam 2.11 - Clans / Squads 2.12 - Cheats / Hacks / Cracks / Trainers 3 - The Adjective Army 1 - Introducion =============== 1.1 - Unified FAQ ================= The Unified FAQ (UFAQ) for the Command & Conquer newsgroups was put together by Sigbj�rn Lund Olsen (aka Eol or The Profound Eol) from various pieces of the AGRA / AGTS / AGRA2 FAQs. Its purpose is to move all the newsgroup posting guidelines into one FAQ to minimize work on every FAQ, and to establish a common standard for all the Command & Conquer newsgroups. It is also to provide as a _small_ guide to the Command & Conquer newsgroups for newbies to read. The UFAQ will be posted once a week in every Command & Conquer newsgroup. Suggestions and comments can be sent to the current maintainer of the UFAQ. 1.2 - Group-specific FAQs ========================= Some of the groups covered by the UFAQ also has a group-specifc FAQ answering questions related to the specific game covered by the group. The group-specific FAQs do not have posting guidelines in them any longer, as the UFAQ covers this topic. 2 - Newsgroup Guidelines ======================== The C&C newsgroups are unmoderated newsgroups, but the regulars there have a few basic rules and guidelines that we believe are common courteousy and netiquette... 2.1 - Posting 101 ================= There is a loose, general standard for posts on the Usenet, and following this standard is considered good netiquette on the Usenet. You should follow the guidelines as written in this UFAQ, and in addition to the other points specified, there are certain things you should and should not do. You should intersperse your reply in between the quoted text to which you are replying to. Non-relevant quoted text should be removed - the reply should still be possible to put within context through the quoted text. On no account shall quoted text be modified - this is considered trolling of the worst sort, and will be treated as such. Try to be polite when asking questions and you are likely to get and answer, provided the question is sensible. Do not make demands, you are likely to be flamed, at the very least your question is unlikely to be taken seriously. Do not overuse caps, only use this to emphasise the odd word here and there. Whole messages or phrases typed in caps are considered to be shouting and this is considered offensive. Try to have correct grammar (especially capitalization and punctuation) as this makes your posts easier to read. Do not write like an "l33t haX0r" and expect to get a (serious) reply. When replying to off-topic posts check which newsgroups the message was sent to as some people crosspost. In the case of crossposts bear in mind that others do not know which newsgroup you received the message in. If the crosspost is a result of spam or trolling, you should remove all groups which you are not posting to. Try not to crosspost unless necessary, and remove any superfluous groups from a reply to a crossposted thread. 2.2 - Newbies ============= As a general rule new users should lurk in the newsgroup for at least a few days to get a feel for the type of messages posted. Newbies should also read the FAQ. Often, an answer for the question which a new user wishes to ask is already answered. Frequently repeated questions can be very tiresome for the regulars, and may be targeted for ridicule and general flaming. 2.3 - Trolls ============ Trolls will be counter-flamed until they are burnt to a crispy shell. Bear with the NG in question during the process of doing so - a world without trolls is much better to live (and post) in. Trolls are considered people who make insults towards members etc with no need, reason, or purpose in the newsgroup. People who repeatedly disrespect the other users of the NG are usually also regarded as trolls. 2.4 - Flames ============ At times disagreements will occur, and/or trolls will appear. Furthermore, the regulars of the groups sometimes flame newbies when they do not follow netiquette (if you read this UFAQ and take it to heart you won't have that problem). One should try to avoid flaming anyone. You should also consider taking the disagreement to e-mail, especially so if other users of the newsgroups request this. 2.5 - On-Topic / Off-Topic ========================== The C&C newsgroups are generally extremely tolerant of off-topic posts, and off-topic posts are allowed in these groups. An effort should be made to post on-topic posts every now and then. The C&C groups have a saying - "Come for the game, stay for the people." - The regulars of the groups are a very closely knit bunch, and as such idle talk will always be a major part of the C&C newsgroups. Newbies should respect this, and should at no time assume that they can, should or must change this - previous attempts have led to large flame wars. 2.6 - Top Posting ================= As mentioned in 2.1, you should intersperse your comments into your replies. This means you do *not* top post - for any people who don't know, top-posting is the posting of a reply above the quoted text, without any reply interspersed later on. 2.7 - HTML ========== HTML posts are not welcome in the C&C newsgroups - many people who read it pay for internet time, and since HTML posts are larger than text posts, they increase download time. Also, there should be no need for HTML, as plain text is a good enough media. 2.8 - Binaries ============== AT NO TIME SHOULD YOU EVER POST BINARIES TO AN alt.* GROUP THAT IS NOT IN THE alt.binaries.* hierarchy! Binaries (ALL attachments are binaries... That includes VCards and attached text files) should be direct to the newsgroup alt.binaries.games.command-n-conq, or the RA2-specific binaries newsgroup alt.binaries.games.redalert2 - alt.binaries.games.command-n-conq is more widely propagated, mind. Many people who read newsgroups have to pay for internet time - respect that by not posting binaries. If you post a binary to any of the regular C&C newsgroups, then the regulars there will consider you a troll and fry you into a crisp shell. Consider yourself warned! 2.9 - Signatures ================ Signatures should not be excessively long or offensive - use common sense... If other members of the NG find your signature to be too long or offensive, please respect them and change it. 2.10 - Spam =========== Don't spam. On-topic advertising (Anything related to the newsgroup in question) is permissible, but not repeatedly. If need be, put the link in your signature and post useful posts. 2.11 - Clans / Squads ===================== No clan/squad warfare in these NGs. No clan/squad advertising except for in sigs - and ONE recruitment post. You can make clan/squad challenges etc, but do not argue about which clan/squad is the best. Clan/squad warfare and repeated recruitment posts will be regarded as trolling... 2.12 - Cheats / Hacks / Cracks / Trainers ========================================= None of the C&C games on the PC platform have any cheats. Cheats, hacks, cracks, trainers, and warez are off-topic and unwanted in the C&C newsgroups, and will therefore almost always result in either ridicule or flames. DO NOT ASK FOR CHEATS, HACKS, CRACKS OR TRAINERS AND DO NOT ASK FOR SUPPORT FOR THESE THINGS EITHER. You use hacks, cracks and trainers at your own risk, and they are illegal through the terms of your licence (You do have one, right?) to the game, and are thus not supported by Virgin Games, Electronic Arts or Westwood Studios. They are not supported by us either. 3 - The Adjective Army ====================== The Adjective Army is a group of people that reside in the C&C newsgroups, and indeed, most of the regulars are members of the Adjective Army (termed as Adjective Assholes, due to our favourite troll, Hans). The Adjective Army have a separate FAQ and a separate group, alt.fan.adjective-army, and a website, http://www.adjective-army.com/. The AA website is also the host of the various NG websites, which at the time of writing, there are none of. There used to be an AGTS website, but it currently only exists on my HD. I need to update and rewrite it before putting it up. Do not assume that the AA are evil or trolls - we are not. We maintain the FAQs, we answer questions, we try to help, we maintain the websites etc etc. Without the AA the groups would by all likelihood be dead. Furthermore, the AA are relatively organized, and as such are capable of efficiently "dealing" with trolls - the AA has never, ever, *ever*, lost a flamewar.
Re: UFAQ
Author: Blon T
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 15:37
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 15:37
8 lines
1476 bytes
1476 bytes
Stop this nonsense. I say what I want you hear me. I Cheat, I lie, and i want to know if i can have you-re serial number...... So please stop posting this stupid messages. They are really annoying. you think hat anybody follows them. I don't and you stupid die-hards. Build a private community if you don't want 'what you consider' dumb questions. #the man who sold the world#
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Arcane Chas
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 16:59
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 16:59
46 lines
2002 bytes
2002 bytes
In article <98306t$4ss$1...@info.service.rug.nl>, but only after serious contemplation, Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> put finger to keyboard and produced the following; >Stop this nonsense. Or....... ? >I say what I want you hear me. That's fine - and we flame you, OK ? >I Cheat, I lie, So that's established your lack of worthiness. >and i >want to know if i can have you-re serial number...... You already know the answer to that one. >So please stop posting this stupid messages. No. >They are really annoying. Tough. >you >think hat anybody follows them. We don't care. >I don't and you stupid die-hards. Build a >private community if you don't want 'what you consider' dumb questions. We already have a private community - *this* is it. If you can't cope with that then do the "other thing". -- Cheers, Chas. "Reality leaves a lot to the imagination".
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Obdurate Ozjish
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 18:27
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 18:27
31 lines
2093 bytes
2093 bytes
"Blon[T]" wrote: > Stop this nonsense. We would cease to exist if we did that. > I say what I want you hear me And we flame you, nice and krispy, because you do so, you hear me? What's your point anyway? > . I Cheat, I lie, and i > want to know if i can have you-re serial number...... In general, you suck at games and/or are too miserly to buy them. > So please stop posting this stupid messages. They are really annoying. you > think hat anybody follows them. Nooo, you're making a thinking-mistake here... you think we're here for others. We're not; we're here for our entertainment. And it's clueless dumbasses such as yourself that provide us with such entertainment. Next to that, we're willing to help people with gaming problems and are maintaining Usenet Etiquette (up to a certain point). > I don't and you stupid die-hards. Build a > private community if you don't want 'what you consider' dumb questions. We *have* a private community, you ignorant dolt. This very newsgroup(s). Now, don't slam the door too hard when you leave.
Re: UFAQ
Author: Blade
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 20:59
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 20:59
14 lines
1699 bytes
1699 bytes
Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:98306t$4ss$1@info.service.rug.nl... > Stop this nonsense. I say what I want you hear me. I Cheat, I lie, and i > want to know if i can have you-re serial number...... > > So please stop posting this stupid messages. They are really annoying. you > think hat anybody follows them. I don't and you stupid die-hards. Build a > private community if you don't want 'what you consider' dumb questions. > > #the man who sold the world# > > >
Re: UFAQ
Author: Blade
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 21:14
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 21:14
57 lines
2760 bytes
2760 bytes
Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:98306t$4ss$1@info.service.rug.nl... > Stop this nonsense. I say what I want you hear me. You can say what you want, but fortunately I am not in ear shot to have to put up with listening to it. You can also write what you want but it will largely be mocked and picked apart in these NG's >I Cheat, I lie, All in all a waste of materials then aren't you? >and i > want to know if i can have you-re serial number...... Come on now, the "-" key isn't any where near the ' key. Some typos are forgivable but if hte keys aren't even near each other....are you using some kind of deformed key board? An american style one maybe? > > So please stop posting this stupid messages. When you stop posting messages will may begin to think about it, ultimately deciding not to. >They are really annoying. Good, then they are having the desired effect on you. >you > think hat anybody follows them. Only those people who actually want us to help them or just want to join in the merriment with us. quite frankly I think I speak for everyone when I say we don't give a damn whether tossers like you follow them. >I don't and you stupid die-hards. I don't think that is a complete sentence. >Build a > private community if you don't want 'what you consider' dumb questions. > This IS our private community. > #the man who sold the world# Who'd you sell it to, yourself? -- Blade My good computer has died and I am forced to use my old cyrix 166+ so this is the official "My good computer has died so I am using a cyrix" sig. Change .con to demon<dot>co<dot>uk to send mail.
Re: UFAQ
Author: JackAnus
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 21:22
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 21:22
9 lines
1476 bytes
1476 bytes
*snip* > Come on now, the "-" key isn't any where near the ' key. Some typos are > forgivable but if hte keys aren't even near each other....are you using some > kind of deformed key board? An american style one maybe? *snip* Whoa whoa whoa. I missed something. Americans have there own style of keyboards? What to you people use?
Re: UFAQ
Author: Blon T
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 09:32
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 09:32
33 lines
2364 bytes
2364 bytes
Oke. does anyone here know anything about the word private. Look in the dictionary and you will see that it means, not allowed for everyone. So this forum is farrrrrrrr from private and the need for a UFUCK says it all. Then about the typing thing. How long did you search? I try and read your thoughts. ##Damn the boy is right, we are losers, but in our ufaq it is said that we must flame everybody that thinks we are losers. So lets see, he is right thus I must find something else. <SEARCHING> Yes a type error. Let's flame him on that. Now he's sorry for all the times he messed with me## Come on. Is that the only thing you can say to me. . At least the others tried to 'flame'. "JackAnus" <joh...@ici.net> wrote in message news:bzcp6.1229$9o5.113900@news.goodnet.com... > *snip* > > Come on now, the "-" key isn't any where near the ' key. Some typos are > > forgivable but if hte keys aren't even near each other....are you using > some > > kind of deformed key board? An american style one maybe? > *snip* > > Whoa whoa whoa. I missed something. Americans have there own style of > keyboards? What to you people use? > >
Re: UFAQ
Author: JackAnus
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 15:32
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 15:32
26 lines
2184 bytes
2184 bytes
Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:984v6p$mv3$1@info.service.rug.nl... > Oke. does anyone here know anything about the word private. Look in the > dictionary and you will see that it means, not allowed for everyone. So this > forum is farrrrrrrr from private and the need for a UFUCK says it all. > > Then about the typing thing. How long did you search? I try and read your > thoughts. > ##Damn the boy is right, we are losers, but in our ufaq it is said that we > must flame everybody that thinks we are losers. So lets see, he is right > thus I must find something else. > > <SEARCHING> > > Yes a type error. Let's flame him on that. Now he's sorry for all the times > he messed with me## > > Come on. Is that the only thing you can say to me. . At least the others > tried to 'flame'. > > Uh...I was actually asking the question. I wasn't just trying to piss you off.
Re: UFAQ
Author: Blon T
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 16:46
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 16:46
48 lines
2794 bytes
2794 bytes
The funny thing here is that people don't even know how to post here. Or is sending me personal mail a threat or something? Please let me know cause then I can be scared.... #LAUGHING OUT LOUD# "Blon[T]" <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:984v6p$mv3$1@info.service.rug.nl... > Oke. does anyone here know anything about the word private. Look in the > dictionary and you will see that it means, not allowed for everyone. So this > forum is farrrrrrrr from private and the need for a UFUCK says it all. > > Then about the typing thing. How long did you search? I try and read your > thoughts. > ##Damn the boy is right, we are losers, but in our ufaq it is said that we > must flame everybody that thinks we are losers. So lets see, he is right > thus I must find something else. > > <SEARCHING> > > Yes a type error. Let's flame him on that. Now he's sorry for all the times > he messed with me## > > Come on. Is that the only thing you can say to me. . At least the others > tried to 'flame'. > > > > "JackAnus" <joh...@ici.net> wrote in message > news:bzcp6.1229$9o5.113900@news.goodnet.com... > > *snip* > > > Come on now, the "-" key isn't any where near the ' key. Some typos are > > > forgivable but if hte keys aren't even near each other....are you using > > some > > > kind of deformed key board? An american style one maybe? > > *snip* > > > > Whoa whoa whoa. I missed something. Americans have there own style of > > keyboards? What to you people use? > > > > > >
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Erudite S.Honer²
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 17:04
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 17:04
26 lines
1892 bytes
1892 bytes
"Blon[T]" <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:985ojp$16h$1@info.service.rug.nl... > The funny thing here is that people don't even know how to post here. Or is > sending me personal mail a threat or something? > > Please let me know cause then I can be scared.... > > #LAUGHING OUT LOUD# My word, thou art a fool. Feague thyself with an eel, fool. -- The Erudite S.Honer� [ www.nanobitdot.com ] -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GC/ED/G/H/P/S/SS d s+:- a--- C++ U P L+ E---- W+++ N++ o? K+ w !O M+ V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP t+ 5-- X+ R* tv b+++ DI+ D++ G e>+++++ h+ r* y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Omniscient Blade
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 18:53
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 18:53
66 lines
3477 bytes
3477 bytes
Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:984v6p$mv3$1@info.service.rug.nl... > Oke. does anyone here know anything about the word private. Look in the > dictionary and you will see that it means, not allowed for everyone. So this > forum is farrrrrrrr from private and the need for a UFUCK says it all. Private can also be applied to control. This NG is under our private control and if you want an easy time here you better get along with us. > > Then about the typing thing. How long did you search? Search? For what? >I try and read your > thoughts. > ##Damn the boy is right, we are losers, Whoa, your psychic probe is way off. Looks like your getting feed back and just realising your own subconscious aknowledgement of your own lack of ability to win. >but in our ufaq it is said that we > must flame everybody that thinks we are losers. No, it says (okay, infers) we flame people who ARE loosers, hence you get flamed. >So lets see, he is right > thus I must find something else. You really should work on those psychic powers. The only things I think about are molecular biology, genetics, how I am right all the time (thus precuding the possability of me thinking I am wrong) and of course, sex (with females exclusively, sorry to dissapoint some of you out there...Blont maybe). > > <SEARCHING> > > Yes a type error. Let's flame him on that. Now he's sorry for all the times > he messed with me## A stupid typer error actually. I wouldn't have bothered if it was a key right next to ' like a ; or a # but it was two keys away. Of course for all the sense that your posts make, you are probably just mashing the keyboard with your palm. > > Come on. Is that the only thing you can say to me. . At least the others > tried to 'flame'. Yeah, but I was late on the scene and all your other stupidity had already been covered. It would reflect really well on me if I just reiterated what others had posted. -- Blade My good computer has died and I am forced to use my old cyrix 166+ so this is the official "My good computer has died so I am using a cyrix" sig. Change .con to demon<dot>co<dot>uk to send mail.
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Arcane Chas
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 19:13
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 19:13
18 lines
1675 bytes
1675 bytes
In article <985ojp$16h$1...@info.service.rug.nl>, but only after serious contemplation, Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> put finger to keyboard and produced the following; >The funny thing here is that people don't even know how to post here. ... said the "top-poster". >Or is >sending me personal mail a threat or something? Nothing to do with us squire - maybe you've won a fan. -- Cheers, Chas. "Reality leaves a lot to the imagination".
Re: UFAQ
Author: Blon T
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 11:56
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 11:56
17 lines
2268 bytes
2268 bytes
My stupidity? Already covered? The only thing I heard is some people trying to come up with stuff that is totally of the subject. I've not been flamed yet. Only that typing error were i'm smashing my keyboard. The reason therefore was probably the fact that I can't stand the ignorance level you people live by. Go have life of your own in stead of trying to build a community that consists only out of a bunch of computer nerds who will give their life for their net-code. I read in the faq that you people never lose in flaming? Have you ever had a real battle? May'be I'm the only one that is stupid enough that keeps trying to teach you guys real lessons in flaming. The rest probably thought it had no use and saw no real challenge. Well I do, I believe in you guys. I think that in a couple of months you will have the skills to go out of your 'private community' and try the real internet. But first you can practice with me to learn the basics. Your teacher
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Erudite S.Honer²
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 16:06
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 16:06
74 lines
3210 bytes
3210 bytes
"Blon[T]" <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:987s07$l35$1@info.service.rug.nl... > My stupidity? Right where you left it, by the dresser. >Already covered? Yes. >The only thing I heard is some people trying > to come up with stuff that is totally of the subject. I've not been flamed > yet. Only that typing error were i'm smashing my keyboard. It was 'mashing with your palm', presumably you're still doing it. >The reason > therefore was probably the fact that I can't stand the ignorance level you > people live by. Another reason to get lost then. >Go have life of your own in stead of trying to build a > community that consists only out of a bunch of computer nerds who will give > their life for their net-code. Ah yes, where once I was blind, now I can see. What have I been doing wasting my time with these people when I could play hide the soap with you?! > I read in the faq that you people never lose in flaming? Have you ever had a > real battle? Yes. >May'be I'm the only one that is stupid enough that keeps trying > to teach you guys real lessons in flaming. Well, you're certainly stupid enough but you're not teaching anything. >The rest probably thought it had > no use and saw no real challenge. Well I do, I believe in you guys. I think > that in a couple of months you will have the skills to go out of your > 'private community' and try the real internet. That would be usenet and you misunderstand us. We are not trolls and we like it very well in our private community with the barb wire and the electric fence. >But first you can practice > with me to learn the basics. ...Right... > Your teacher ROFLMAO -- The Erudite S.Honer� [ www.nanobitdot.com ] -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GC/ED/G/H/P/S/SS d s+:- a--- C++ U P L+ E---- W+++ N++ o? K+ w !O M+ V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP t+ 5-- X+ R* tv b+++ DI+ D++ G e>+++++ h+ r* y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Arcane Chas
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 17:34
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 17:34
21 lines
1752 bytes
1752 bytes
In article <987s07$l35$1...@info.service.rug.nl>, but only after serious contemplation, Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> put finger to keyboard and produced the following; >But first you can practice >with me to learn the basics. You are not worth the effort. >Your teacher Nor do you possess the necessary qualifications or experience. Please learn *how* to post before submitting your next attempt. -- Cheers, Chas. "Reality leaves a lot to the imagination".
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Omniscient Blade
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 22:02
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 22:02
84 lines
4227 bytes
4227 bytes
Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:987s07$l35$1@info.service.rug.nl... > My stupidity? Already covered? Yeah, but its fun to point out others failings. >The only thing I heard is some people trying > to come up with stuff that is totally of the subject. Hearing things while reading this NG? Either you have noisy neighbours or you need psychiatric help (okay, the second one is already established). >I've not been flamed > yet. Only that typing error were i'm smashing my keyboard. Exceptions break the rule, hence you have been flamed and thus saying you haven't is a load of bollocks. >The reason > therefore was probably the fact that I can't stand the ignorance level you > people live by. The reason you were (and presumably still are) mashing the keyboard with your palm? Your right, we do have to live by a high level of ignorance otherwise known as people like you. >Go have life of your own in stead of trying to build a > community that consists only out of a bunch of computer nerds who will give > their life for their net-code. The irony being that you need to be a computer nerd yourself to be posting the volume of crap against us that you are doing. Is this some sort of manifestation of your own self loathing? You need to accept yourself for who you are and learn to be happy without having to pick fault with others to make your self feel big. > > I read in the faq that you people never lose in flaming? Have you ever had a > real battle? Yeah, with real competition too unlike this little game we are playing with you. >May'be I'm the only one that is stupid enough No, we have had to deal with equally stupid people in our time, but they had more raw talent than you to make up for it. >that keeps trying > to teach you guys real lessons in flaming. Incoherent drivel hardly counts as "teaching" us lessons in "flaming" >The rest probably thought it had > no use and saw no real challenge. Well I do, I believe in you guys. I think > that in a couple of months you will have the skills to go out of your > 'private community' and try the real internet. I don't think you quite understand the level at which we "play" this little game. We've toppled whole newsgroups of people, so toying with you is just for our amusement. >But first you can practice > with me to learn the basics. I think you need to learn the basics of life. Lets start at the beggining...one day you mommy and daddy really loved each other............ > > Your teacher I don't think taking lessons in stupidity is really a productive use of my time, so I'll stick to biochemistry. -- Blade I'm still stuck on a Cyrix damn it :/ Change .con to demon<dot>co<dot>uk to send mail.
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Obdurate Ozjish
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 00:03
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 00:03
61 lines
3421 bytes
3421 bytes
"Blon[T]" wrote: > My stupidity? Already covered? Your utter stupidity, displayed here in these NGs. Indeed. > The only thing I heard is some people trying > to come up with stuff that is totally of the subject. I've not been flamed > yet. Well, you had better start looking then, because right now you're a torch. > Only that typing error were i'm smashing my keyboard. The reason > therefore was probably the fact that I can't stand the ignorance level you > people live by. Go have life of your own in stead of trying to build a > community that consists only out of a bunch of computer nerds who will give > their life for their net-code. MOMMA! He named me a computernerd! Really, he did! Go get him, mom! >I read in the faq that you people never lose in flaming? That's right. > Have you ever had a real battle? Several. This, BTW, is not one of them. You're a mere ignorant idiot, refusing to see that you're being played with by everybody else. > May'be I'm the only one that is stupid enough that keeps trying to teach you guys real lessons in flaming. So far, we're waiting for something more catching than calling us "computernerds who will give their life for their net-code". > The rest probably thought it had no use and saw no real challenge. At least *pretend* to do your best. This does not even get close to an insult. > Well I do, I believe in you guys. I think > that in a couple of months you will have the skills to go out of your > 'private community' and try the real internet. Usenet. > But first you can practice > with me to learn the basics. > Your teacher Pfwhehehehe... Boy, you're nothing special. There is only one reason we reply to you, and that is because we need some target practice. You're one in a large row of targets that have come and gone in these newsgroups the last 3 years... all of them thought they were special. All of them thought they were booking success because we replied to them, and none of them ever realized that they were the mouse in a cats nest, simply being used to provide us the necessary entertainment next to our own drivel.
Re: UFAQ
Author: Blon T
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 07:26
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 07:26
11 lines
1965 bytes
1965 bytes
Sure I understand that you want to make my look bad. But what makes it so unbelievable simplistic is that you can't make up your own story. Replying to every sentence is easy and really not quite original. Effective is something else. You're trying to make a point and thats a good thing, but outside people who read this will have more respect for you if you make a story of your own. MAy'be you can practise this in the weekend cause I'm going away then. But remember I'll be back on tuesday to see if you people have learned. Okay, now goodbye to you all and remember: Practisssssssssseeee
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Arcane Chas
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 13:46
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 13:46
23 lines
2263 bytes
2263 bytes
In article <98a0hk$c14$1...@info.service.rug.nl>, but only after serious contemplation, Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> put finger to keyboard and produced the following; >Sure I understand that you want to make my look bad. But what makes it so >unbelievable simplistic is that you can't make up your own story. Replying >to every sentence is easy and really not quite original. Effective is >something else. You're trying to make a point and thats a good thing, but >outside people who read this will have more respect for you if you make a >story of your own. MAy'be you can practise this in the weekend cause I'm >going away then. > >But remember I'll be back on tuesday to see if you people have learned. > >Okay, now goodbye to you all and remember: Practisssssssssseeee Who are you talking to? -- Cheers, Chas. "Reality leaves a lot to the imagination".
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Obdurate Ozjish
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 15:50
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 15:50
29 lines
2344 bytes
2344 bytes
"Blon[T]" wrote: > Sure I understand that you want to make my look bad. But what makes it so > unbelievable simplistic is that you can't make up your own story. Replying > to every sentence is easy and really not quite original. Yes, it is. > Effective is something else. Nope. This is as effective as can be and you know it. > You're trying to make a point and thats a good thing, but > outside people who read this will have more respect for you if you make a > story of your own. MAy'be you can practise this in the weekend cause I'm > going away then. Your arguments, never having any real fighting value, have now completely ceased to make sense. Which means you entered the next phase: the Keepituplongerthanthem-phase. We won. And it took us 3 posts. See why you're target-practice instead of a real opponent? > But remember I'll be back on tuesday to see if you people have learned. > > Okay, now goodbye to you all and remember: Practisssssssssseeee This is why. :o)
Re: UFAQ
Author: LOKI
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 02:45
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 02:45
41 lines
2746 bytes
2746 bytes
i payed $10 bucks for tiberian sun and $5 for firestorm so blon if u are too cheap to pay that for a 100% legal copy than stop playing video games.... and check around the web for the crap u are looking for leave the newsgroup alone.. or at least check the appropiate news groups and this is not one of them.... "The Obdurate Ozjish" <ozj...@adjective-army.com> wrote in message news:3AA52DB4.4AA153F5@adjective-army.com... > "Blon[T]" wrote: > > > Stop this nonsense. > > We would cease to exist if we did that. > > > I say what I want you hear me > > And we flame you, nice and krispy, because you do so, you hear me? > What's your point anyway? > > > . I Cheat, I lie, and i > > want to know if i can have you-re serial number...... > > In general, you suck at games and/or are too miserly to buy them. > > > So please stop posting this stupid messages. They are really annoying. you > > think hat anybody follows them. > > Nooo, you're making a thinking-mistake here... you think we're here for > others. We're not; we're here for our entertainment. > And it's clueless dumbasses such as yourself that provide us with such > entertainment. > Next to that, we're willing to help people with gaming problems and are > maintaining Usenet Etiquette (up to a certain point). > > > I don't and you stupid die-hards. Build a > > private community if you don't want 'what you consider' dumb questions. > > We *have* a private community, you ignorant dolt. This very newsgroup(s). > Now, don't slam the door too hard when you leave. >
Re: UFAQ
Author: JackAnus
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 04:10
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 04:10
16 lines
2178 bytes
2178 bytes
Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:98a0hk$c14$1@info.service.rug.nl... > Sure I understand that you want to make my look bad. But what makes it so > unbelievable simplistic is that you can't make up your own story. Replying > to every sentence is easy and really not quite original. Effective is > something else. You're trying to make a point and thats a good thing, but > outside people who read this will have more respect for you if you make a > story of your own. MAy'be you can practise this in the weekend cause I'm > going away then. > > But remember I'll be back on tuesday to see if you people have learned. > > Okay, now goodbye to you all and remember: Practisssssssssseeee > Last time i checked, "Practise" was spelled with a "C". Practice.
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Sublime Chris
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 06:30
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 06:30
20 lines
2281 bytes
2281 bytes
"JackAnus" <joh...@ici.net> wrote: > >Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:98a0hk$c14$1@info.service.rug.nl... >> Sure I understand that you want to make my look bad. But what makes it so >> unbelievable simplistic is that you can't make up your own story. Replying >> to every sentence is easy and really not quite original. Effective is >> something else. You're trying to make a point and thats a good thing, but >> outside people who read this will have more respect for you if you make a >> story of your own. MAy'be you can practise this in the weekend cause I'm >> going away then. >> >> But remember I'll be back on tuesday to see if you people have learned. >> >> Okay, now goodbye to you all and remember: Practisssssssssseeee >> >Last time i checked, "Practise" was spelled with a "C". Practice. "practise" is a verb, "practice" is a noun (and an adjective).
Re: UFAQ
Author: JackAnus
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 22:34
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 22:34
30 lines
2631 bytes
2631 bytes
Oh, then my spell checker is messed up. It didn't find Practise in its dictionary. The Sublime Chris <ch...@adjective-army.com> wrote in message news:dp6mat8ltrmkmh332q740okpiiubia88ec@4ax.com... > "JackAnus" <joh...@ici.net> wrote: > > > > >Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >news:98a0hk$c14$1@info.service.rug.nl... > >> Sure I understand that you want to make my look bad. But what makes it so > >> unbelievable simplistic is that you can't make up your own story. Replying > >> to every sentence is easy and really not quite original. Effective is > >> something else. You're trying to make a point and thats a good thing, but > >> outside people who read this will have more respect for you if you make a > >> story of your own. MAy'be you can practise this in the weekend cause I'm > >> going away then. > >> > >> But remember I'll be back on tuesday to see if you people have learned. > >> > >> Okay, now goodbye to you all and remember: Practisssssssssseeee > >> > >Last time i checked, "Practise" was spelled with a "C". Practice. > > "practise" is a verb, "practice" is a noun (and an adjective). >
Re: UFAQ
Author: The Whimsical Reycov
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 03:24
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 03:24
26 lines
2266 bytes
2266 bytes
A short time ago, in a newsgroup not very far away, "JackAnus" <joh...@ici.net> wrote: >Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:98a0hk$c14$1@info.service.rug.nl... >> Sure I understand that you want to make my look bad. But what makes it so >> unbelievable simplistic is that you can't make up your own story. Replying >> to every sentence is easy and really not quite original. Effective is >> something else. You're trying to make a point and thats a good thing, but >> outside people who read this will have more respect for you if you make a >> story of your own. MAy'be you can practise this in the weekend cause I'm >> going away then. >> >> But remember I'll be back on tuesday to see if you people have learned. >> >> Okay, now goodbye to you all and remember: Practisssssssssseeee >> >Last time i checked, "Practise" was spelled with a "C". Practice. Then why did you spell it with a "c"? .-P -- The Whimsical Reycov http://whimsical.cjb.net http://galanet.cjb.net (under construction)
Re: UFAQ
Author: Syrius
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 04:39
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 04:39
27 lines
2075 bytes
2075 bytes
"The Arcane Chas" <Ch...@adjective-army.com> wrote in message news:qR5BRIAshop6Ew9o@the-arcane.demon.co.uk... > In article <985ojp$16h$1...@info.service.rug.nl>, but only after serious > contemplation, Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> put finger to keyboard > and produced the following; > >The funny thing here is that people don't even know how to post here. > > ... said the "top-poster". > > >Or is > >sending me personal mail a threat or something? > > Nothing to do with us squire - maybe you've won a fan. > A fan? They call them stalkers where I come from... -- Regards -Syrius- ------------------------------------------ Where once there was a mind there is now a cavernous void which I call my sanity.......... ------------------------------------------ email syr...@joner.karoo.co.uk ICQ# 96701837
Re: UFAQ
Author: Syrius
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 04:41
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 04:41
31 lines
2692 bytes
2692 bytes
"The Arcane Chas" <Ch...@adjective-army.com> wrote in message news:wETX0KAL7Nq6Ew2L@the-arcane.demon.co.uk... > In article <98a0hk$c14$1...@info.service.rug.nl>, but only after serious > contemplation, Blon[T] <Mrblo...@hotmail.com> put finger to keyboard > and produced the following; > >Sure I understand that you want to make my look bad. But what makes it so > >unbelievable simplistic is that you can't make up your own story. Replying > >to every sentence is easy and really not quite original. Effective is > >something else. You're trying to make a point and thats a good thing, but > >outside people who read this will have more respect for you if you make a > >story of your own. MAy'be you can practise this in the weekend cause I'm > >going away then. > > > >But remember I'll be back on tuesday to see if you people have learned. > > > >Okay, now goodbye to you all and remember: Practisssssssssseeee > You seem to have got some of your keys a little sticky : / -- Regards -Syrius- ------------------------------------------ Where once there was a mind there is now a cavernous void which I call my sanity.......... ------------------------------------------ email syr...@joner.karoo.co.uk ICQ# 96701837
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads