🚀 go-pugleaf

the...@usit.net wrote:
> Right on!!!!!!!!! I, too, believe that Micros' success is in Gates.
> Plus, the  programs that Microsoft makes are slightly more simple for
> the "Newbies" and "Non-Com" type people. I use Netscape 3.0. I think
> it is much better then IE 3.0. I get better performace, speed, and
> handleing of "special" situations.
>                                 Phire Bommer

Finally, some people I can totally relate to!  I am not into linux or
unix yet, but I would really like to get into it.  I like netscape WAY
better than IE for a number of reasons.  First of all, IE handles
embedded files in email awkwardly.  It's news program is strange to me
(but that is probably just because I am not used to it, so I am not
dumping it).  I really haven't gotten into any windows 95 games yet, so
I don't know how they are.  The main reason for that is probably because
of low RAM.  I am scared to buy a program that runs in win95 because of
it.  I have purchased warcraft 2, however, and it is a DOS application,
but runs PERFECT in win95.  So do many other older dos applications. 
Actually, there was even one dos program that I got that wouldn't even
run when you "restart in ms-dos mode", but would run in ms-dos mode.
I'm off the topic with this, so I'll stop with it.  
But why is "down with Netscape" in alt.doom.games anyways???
-steve