🚀 go-pugleaf

The Eikenberrys wrote:
> 
> In article <3332b22...@news.intergate.bc.ca>,
>    bhas...@intergate.bc.ca (Stephen Hassard) wrote:
> >On Thu, 20 Mar 1997 20:44:43 -0800, Burghy <lu...@BLAhkstar.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>Ur welcome.  C&C had a stone-paper-scissors balance.  RA doesn't,
> >>because the infantry-tank-anti infantry is upset, because the tanks are
> >>good against everything.  Therefore there is no use for anti-infantry
> >>which is vulnerable to tanks (e.g. ranger), and infantry is ineffective
> >>(except sometimes bazookas.)
> >
> >it sounds like westwood should make the infantry stronger and make
> >them just about impossible to crush as in c&c original (if one knows
> >how to press 'X') hint, hint (if someone at westwood is listening...)
> >
> >later,
> >Steve
> ummm, can't you press x in RA and get the same results? Infantry is hard to
> kill as it is, BTW. I don't want them as strong as tanks. :)
> Lordfly


No they aren't.  Not for multiplayer at least.  Trust me.  They are
worthless.  Especially the $300 russian flamers.
-- 
The Attack Dog: Red Alert      | "Why did the tachyon
http://home.hkstar.com/~luibr/ |    cross the road?"
(please remove 'BLA' to reply) | "It was on the other side."