Re: Ships in generals?

Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq

Article #33632

Back to alt.games.command-n-conq Previous Next

#33632

From: TCipollina
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:27

31 lines
2363 bytes

"Neil Adamson" <ada...@uk.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:b47529$1mbc$1@sp15at20.hursley.ibm.com...
>
> "Daniel Morrison" <damo...@yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au> wrote in message
> news:3e667722@itsawnews.its.rmit.edu.au...
> > The Carriers in RA2 were so cool, I always tried to build a couple to
> annoy my opponent with, if the map allows as you said. But some long-range
> naval artillery would be a nice addition to Generals.
>
> Fair comment. Trouble is that against any sort of opponent you then need
air
> defence for the carriers, then AS defence for the Aegis, then anti squid
> defence for the destroyers and before yo uknow it, all you resources have
> been sucked out of the land battle, where, IMHO, you can win it without
> carriers.
>
> Also, I never build superweapons, but allow my skirmish opponents to.
Keeps
> the adrenaline flowing.
>
> If it's worth doing, it's worth doing the hard way.
>
> ;o)
>
> Neil A
>
I agree
if it was easy, it wouldnt be fun.
--
Fight Win Prevail
But Never Cheat

Technical Details

Message-ID: <XHR9a.7926$lS.410@twister.nyroc.rr.com>

Path:

mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!news-out.spamkiller.net!propagator2-maxim!propagator3-maxim!news-in.superfeed.net!news-west.rr.com!cyclone.nyroc.rr.com!cyclone-out.nyroc.rr.com!twister.nyroc.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail

References:

<5ZJ3a.187479$0v.5215760@news1.tin.it> <Xns932478E6FC705fuzzle@62.153.159.134> <XbK3a.250288$AA2.9665749@news2.tin.it> <v4vk9lakuev6e@corp.supernews.com> <3e653ff2@itsawnews.its.rmit.edu.au> <v6cq5r6jpipb2d@corp.supernews.com> <3e667722@itsawnews.its.rmit.edu.au> <b47529$1mbc$1@sp15at20.hursley.ibm.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!news-out.spamkiller.net!propagator2-maxim!propagator3-maxim!news-in.superfeed.net!news-west.rr.com!cyclone.nyroc.rr.com!cyclone-out.nyroc.rr.com!twister.nyroc.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "TCipollina" <joe...@stny.rr.com>
Newsgroups: alt.games.command-n-conq
References: <5ZJ3a.187479$0v.5215760@news1.tin.it> <Xns932478E6FC705fuzzle@62.153.159.134> <XbK3a.250288$AA2.9665749@news2.tin.it> <v4vk9lakuev6e@corp.supernews.com> <3e653ff2@itsawnews.its.rmit.edu.au> <v6cq5r6jpipb2d@corp.supernews.com> <3e667722@itsawnews.its.rmit.edu.au> <b47529$1mbc$1@sp15at20.hursley.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Ships in generals?
Lines: 33
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <XHR9a.7926$lS.410@twister.nyroc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:27:35 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.94.37.17
X-Complaints-To: ab...@rr.com
X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1046996855 24.94.37.17 (Thu, 06 Mar 2003 19:27:35 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 19:27:35 EST
Organization: Road Runner
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message