Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq
Article #314Re: Warcraft 2 VS. Command & Conquer
From: mrb... Chris Kane
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 1996 00:00
15 lines
1394 bytes
1394 bytes
> I realize that there are those who'll probably say that I played C&C >first, and that's why C&C is better. Maybe so. But on unit diversity and >interface, C&C is clearly better. And after you get the canned missions >finished, that matters more than any AI 'problems' you can exploit. WC2's AI is >slightly better, but the game's weaknesses make it more of a chore than a fun >experience. Meanwhile, C&C still gets played around the apartment more.... YES! I hear ya! I have been saying the same damm thing on irc and to local players for a week now...Warcraft2 is fun for about 1 hour, then you see it's the same in strategy wise as warcraft1, build lots of guys and attack! I hate games where it's strategy is to be strong, I like C&C cause you have to think to win,,,what thinking is involved in build 50 orge and attacking. imo
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4cm8kp$a0m@murphy.servtech.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<271295.20165872478.n@frontier.canrem.com> <4c481t$1r0@nuhou.aloha.net>,<4c4dve$kpv@spectator.cris.com> <4cceal$idb@news.isc.rit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: mrb...@sertech.com (Chris Kane) Subject: Re: Warcraft 2 VS. Command & Conquer Date: 1996/01/06 Message-ID: <4cm8kp$a0m@murphy.servtech.com> X-Deja-AN: 134390289 references: <271295.20165872478.n@frontier.canrem.com> <4c481t$1r0@nuhou.aloha.net>,<4c4dve$kpv@spectator.cris.com> <4cceal$idb@news.isc.rit.edu> organization: Service Tech mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: mrb...@servtech.com newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.command-n-conq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit