Re: Which one is better: C&C or RA ??

Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq

Article #23123

Back to alt.games.command-n-conq Previous Next

#23123

From: Kris Eiriksson
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00

30 lines
1580 bytes

It depends what you are looking for, plot, multi-play, single
player-missions, etc.. If you want multi play, it matters in fast
loading times, wanting to kick the cpu's butt and so-on. If its for
multiplay, not just internet, go for RA, If it is missions, go for CC,
If it is for fast overall loading times go for CC, If it is multi-play
RA. Hope I could be of some help.
Rolf Haakon Kristiansen wrote:
> 
> On 12 Mar 1997 14:58:04 GMT, "Fuji Sartono" <sar...@prica.org> wrote:
> 
> >Hi . ..
> >
> >I wanna purchase one of these but which one is better ?
> 
> I've got them both, and would just warn you: while RA becomes boring
> after 5 levels, you can play C&C over and over and over again...
> (However, if you're going to play very much over the net, you should
> consider buying RA.)
> 
> For more game-stuff, visit http://home.sn.no/~rk1012/Games.htm
> 
> --
> - Rolf Haakon Kristiansen
> 
>   Email:        mailto:rk1...@sn.no
>                 mailto:spi...@geocities.com
> 
>   Homepages:    http://home.sn.no/~rk1012/
>                 http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lakes/1331/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3340B432.766C@vcnet.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <01bc2ef5$8bd9c020$010200c0@isac.direct-internet.net> <333c15fd.1512821@nntp.sn.no>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: Kris Eiriksson <eiri...@vcnet.com>
Subject: Re: Which one is better: C&C or RA ??
Date: 1997/04/01
Message-ID: <3340B432.766C@vcnet.com>
X-Deja-AN: 229836486
References: <01bc2ef5$8bd9c020$010200c0@isac.direct-internet.net> <333c15fd.1512821@nntp.sn.no>
Organization: VCNet
Reply-To: Eiri...@bigfoot.com
Newsgroups: alt.games.command-n-conq
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message