Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq
Article #23114Re: Which one is better: C&C or RA ??
From: DRAGON
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:00
20 lines
1084 bytes
1084 bytes
On Thu, 13 Mar 1997, Larry M. Marositz wrote: > "Fuji Sartono" <sar...@prica.org> wrote: > > >Hi . .. > > >I wanna purchase one of these but which one is better ? > > I'd cast my vote for RA. Although the games are very similar in play, RA > has many features not found in C&C. Both are excellent games, though, so > you really cannot go wrong with either choice > > The computer is no better than its program. > - Elting Elmore Morison > ************************************************** I would buy both of them plus the add on missions for C&C> >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.OSF.3.91.970318153535.32199M-100000@leofric>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bc2ef5$8bd9c020$010200c0@isac.direct-internet.net> <5g85c8$ces@hades.intrstar.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: DRAGON <g...@coventry.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Which one is better: C&C or RA ?? Date: 1997/03/18 Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.970318153535.32199M-100000@leofric> X-Deja-AN: 226602647 References: <01bc2ef5$8bd9c020$010200c0@isac.direct-internet.net> <5g85c8$ces@hades.intrstar.net> X-Sender: gdt@leofric Organization: Coventry University Newsgroups: alt.games.command-n-conq MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit