🚀 go-pugleaf

m.moo...@va.nl wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 14 Mar 97 23:35:54 GMT, awku...@ucdavis.edu (Alex Kubiak)
> wrote:
> 
> >In article <Pine.OSF.3.96.97031...@curly.cc.utexas.edu>, Brian Barnes <bba...@uts.cc.utexas.edu> wrote:
<snip>
> 
> What's the point. If you ally with a computer all it does is put it's
> troops in your base which eventually block all ways in or out of your
> base. It's very annoying!
> 
> Also The AI is'nt that good! Al it does is build some troops, attack,
> and build some more, over and over again. No smart use of migs,tanya's
> and so on. It's just plain stuppid!
Maybe if the computer could actually make a decision whether or not to
attack based on the current situation rather than just following a set
pattern determined by Westwood's programmers. Too many times the
computer 
sides will ally with each other and create huge traffic jams which
effectively end a game. The problem is that the AI doesn't seem to be
goal-oriented enough.