🚀 go-pugleaf

On 7 Apr 1997 21:42:21 GMT, "Anonymous" <wei...@acc-net.com> wrote:

>Warcraft II came after Command and Conquer, but before Red Alert.  It was
>great fun to play.  Yes, Red Alert is better, but that's to be expected
>with newer software.  Warcraft II is probably one of the best strategy
>games of all time for the PC.  It goes beyond the 'stupid' or 'cutesy'
>characters.  It takes as much strategy if not more to play Warcraft II as
>it does with Red Alert.  Don't knock the game because it's new and
>different.

Warcraft 2 requires no strategy at all to play, even less than RA. In
Warcraft 2 all you have to do is build a load more ogres than your
opponent and then kill them... Once you have sussed out the quickest
way to do this you have nothing left to learn. In Red Alert being able
to build tanks quickly and continuously is one of the major parts of
the game but it is not the only part.  I can't count the times I have
finished someone by flying tanyas into their base while i started a
tank battle elsewhere on the map or that I have chronosphered a MCV
into a base and built tanyas and turrets right in the base...

---
Boylard
dan...@white.prestel.co.uk
The Red Alert Map Library <http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/8191/ra.htm>