Re: Why some people like C&C better than RA

Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq

Article #21083

Back to alt.games.command-n-conq Previous Next

#21083

From: bs... Seth Bowden
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 00:00

22 lines
1126 bytes

In article <5bk3b6$r...@the-fly.zip.com.au>, spy...@zip.com.au says...
>
>Brad (spar...@usa.net) wrote:
>: Qyroz wrote:
>: > 
>: > - Better music
[snip]
>DONT PLAY RA95 THEN (STUPID IDOIT)
>:  
>: > - Units in RA/95 too small (if you don't have a 21-inch monitor)
>: 
[snip]

A person quoting a 93 line post in its entirety merely to add a *one* line 
utterance (with spelling deficiencies) that my five year old cousin would 
consider inane is probably a candidate for 10 free hours on AOL and most likely 
unqualified to comment on someone else's mental acuity.

-- 
Seth Bowden...@cornell.edu
Popcorn Ladron

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5bpb5f$2lf@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <5bdu60$7o3@snow.btinternet.com> <32DAF6F9.26D4@usa.net> <5bk3b6$rmq@the-fly.zip.com.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: bs...@cornell.edu (Seth Bowden)
Subject: Re: Why some people like C&C better than RA
Date: 1997/01/18
Message-ID: <5bpb5f$2lf@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 211432724
sender: bs...@cornell.edu (Verified)
references: <5bdu60$7o3@snow.btinternet.com> <32DAF6F9.26D4@usa.net> <5bk3b6$rmq@the-fly.zip.com.au>
organization: Cornell University
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: alt.games.command-n-conq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message