🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.folklore.computers
3 messages
3 total messages Started by hanc... Fri, 06 Jul 2018 21:48
OT: RR positive train control
#624778
Author: hanc...
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 21:48
12 lines
1619 bytes
OFF TOPIC

There is a big push now to implement Positive Train Control on
passenger railroads.

Anyone familiar with it?

However, it seems than an earlier system did everything the new
expensive high tech system does:
https://books.google.com/books?id=0SADAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA2&dq=popular%20science%20july%201951&pg=PA50#v=onepage&q&f=false

[public replies, please]
Re: OT: RR positive train control
#624779
Author: John Levine
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 22:07
29 lines
2411 bytes
In article <483113ac-e620-4be1...@googlegroups.com>,
 <hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
>OFF TOPIC

Well, sort of.

>There is a big push now to implement Positive Train Control on
>passenger railroads.
>
>Anyone familiar with it?

>However, it seems than an earlier system did everything the new
>expensive high tech system does:
>https://books.google.com/books?id=0SADAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA2&dq=popular%20science%20july%201951&pg=PA50#v=onepage&q&f=false

The 1950 system enforced speed limits.  PTC does a lot more than that,
like stopping a train if it enters a block with another train in it.

PTC is relatively difficult in the US because we have long stretches
of unsignalled track, but the main problem is that the railroads don't
want to spend the money.  See the Wikipedia article for more info on
what it does and the ways it can work.



-- 
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
Re: OT: RR positive train control
#624780
Author: hanc...
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 19:11
32 lines
2703 bytes
On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:07:47 PM UTC-4, John Levine wrote:
> In article <483113ac-e620-4be1...@googlegroups.com>,
>  <hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:
> >OFF TOPIC
> 
> Well, sort of.
> 
> >There is a big push now to implement Positive Train Control on
> >passenger railroads.
> >
> >Anyone familiar with it?
> 
> >However, it seems than an earlier system did everything the new
> >expensive high tech system does:
> >https://books.google.com/books?id=0SADAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA2&dq=popular%20science%20july%201951&pg=PA50#v=onepage&q&f=false
> 
> The 1950 system enforced speed limits.  PTC does a lot more than that,
> like stopping a train if it enters a block with another train in it.
> 
> PTC is relatively difficult in the US because we have long stretches
> of unsignalled track, but the main problem is that the railroads don't
> want to spend the money.  See the Wikipedia article for more info on
> what it does and the ways it can work.

The July Trains magazine article described PTC.  It required a
great deal of hardware and infrastructure, yet it wasn't clear
what PTC did that ATC didn't already do, or could be easily made
to do.

For instance, a train could be easily stopped before entering
an occupied block by giving a speed code of zero and setting
that to stop.
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads