🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.folklore.computers
12 messages
12 total messages Started by hanc... Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:59
Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618122
Author: hanc...
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:59
8 lines
1672 bytes
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania wants IBM to pay for a failed
computer system.  Detailed article at:
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/pa-wants-160m-back-ibm-reform-it-procurement-20171214.html

Note--employees from the state say the state ordered numerous
change orders to the system, and feel the state is at fault,
not IBM.  Pennsylvania had a lot of problems with its unemployment
compensation offices.
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618123
Author: jmfbahciv
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:45
15 lines
1857 bytes
hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania wants IBM to pay for a failed
> computer system.  Detailed article at:
> http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/pa-wants-160m-back-ibm-re
form-it-procurement-20171214.html
>
> Note--employees from the state say the state ordered numerous
> change orders to the system, and feel the state is at fault,
> not IBM.  Pennsylvania had a lot of problems with its unemployment
> compensation offices.
>
I wonder if PA hired the same people to code the system as Michigan
did.

/BAH
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618124
Author: Charlie Gibbs
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:26
24 lines
2200 bytes
On 2017-12-27, jmfbahciv <See....@aol.com> wrote:

> hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>
>> The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania wants IBM to pay for a failed
>> computer system.  Detailed article at:
>> http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/pa-wants-160m-back-ibm-reform-it-procurement-20171214.html
>>
>> Note--employees from the state say the state ordered numerous
>> change orders to the system, and feel the state is at fault,
>> not IBM.  Pennsylvania had a lot of problems with its unemployment
>> compensation offices.
>
> I wonder if PA hired the same people to code the system as Michigan
> did.

That's not necessary.  Governments everywhere - at all levels -
have a talent for creating IT disasters.

-- 
/~\  cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ /  I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
 X   Top-posted messages will probably be ignored.  See RFC1855.
/ \  HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored.  Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618125
Author: maus
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 09:01
28 lines
2114 bytes
On 2017-12-28, Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
> On 2017-12-27, jmfbahciv <See....@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>>
>>> The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania wants IBM to pay for a failed
>>> computer system.  Detailed article at:
>>> http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/pa-wants-160m-back-ibm-reform-it-procurement-20171214.html
>>>
>>> Note--employees from the state say the state ordered numerous
>>> change orders to the system, and feel the state is at fault,
>>> not IBM.  Pennsylvania had a lot of problems with its unemployment
>>> compensation offices.
>>
>> I wonder if PA hired the same people to code the system as Michigan
>> did.
>
> That's not necessary.  Governments everywhere - at all levels -
> have a talent for creating IT disasters.
>


Thats because the people who get those sort of jobs are not really I.T.
people, they are getting-government-jobs people. 

-- 
greymaus.ireland.ie
Just_Another_Grumpy_Old_Man
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618128
Author: maus
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 13:16
42 lines
3016 bytes
On 2017-12-28, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
> On 2017-12-28, maus <ma...@mail.com> wrote:
>> On 2017-12-28, Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-27, jmfbahciv <See....@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania wants IBM to pay for a failed
>>>>> computer system.  Detailed article at:
>>>>> http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/pa-wants-160m-back-ibm-reform-it-procurement-20171214.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Note--employees from the state say the state ordered numerous
>>>>> change orders to the system, and feel the state is at fault,
>>>>> not IBM.  Pennsylvania had a lot of problems with its unemployment
>>>>> compensation offices.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if PA hired the same people to code the system as Michigan
>>>> did.
>>>
>>> That's not necessary.  Governments everywhere - at all levels -
>>> have a talent for creating IT disasters.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thats because the people who get those sort of jobs are not really I.T.
>> people, they are getting-government-jobs people. 
>
> I know some of the people who work on Government IT projects. They're
> no different to people who work on commercial projects. Hell, I've done
> a tiny bit of consulting to Government, myself. What is different is
> the employer, who believes that the impossible can be achieved "because
> we're the Government".
>


I could name names, but I am sure that my thin veil of anonymity would
soon be ripped apart, and i would be sued. Lets say that some of them
are crap.

-- 
greymaus.ireland.ie
Just_Another_Grumpy_Old_Man
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618127
Author: Charles Richmond
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:57
32 lines
2830 bytes
On 12/28/2017 3:01 AM, maus wrote:
> On 2017-12-28, Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2017-12-27, jmfbahciv <See....@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania wants IBM to pay for a failed
>>>> computer system.  Detailed article at:
>>>> http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/pa-wants-160m-back-ibm-reform-it-procurement-20171214.html
>>>>
>>>> Note--employees from the state say the state ordered numerous
>>>> change orders to the system, and feel the state is at fault,
>>>> not IBM.  Pennsylvania had a lot of problems with its unemployment
>>>> compensation offices.
>>>
>>> I wonder if PA hired the same people to code the system as Michigan
>>> did.
>>
>> That's not necessary.  Governments everywhere - at all levels -
>> have a talent for creating IT disasters.
>>
> 
> 
> Thats because the people who get those sort of jobs are not really I.T.
> people, they are getting-government-jobs people.
> 

This is a big reason Grace Hopper was so valuable to the Navy!  She 
could whip the IT processing into shape!!!

-- 
numerist at aquaporin4 dot com
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618129
Author: Charles Richmond
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:00
49 lines
3676 bytes
On 12/28/2017 9:37 AM, Huge wrote:
> On 2017-12-28, maus <ma...@mail.com> wrote:
>> On 2017-12-28, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-28, maus <ma...@mail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2017-12-28, Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-12-27, jmfbahciv <See....@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania wants IBM to pay for a failed
>>>>>>> computer system.  Detailed article at:
>>>>>>> http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/pa-wants-160m-back-ibm-reform-it-procurement-20171214.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note--employees from the state say the state ordered numerous
>>>>>>> change orders to the system, and feel the state is at fault,
>>>>>>> not IBM.  Pennsylvania had a lot of problems with its unemployment
>>>>>>> compensation offices.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder if PA hired the same people to code the system as Michigan
>>>>>> did.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not necessary.  Governments everywhere - at all levels -
>>>>> have a talent for creating IT disasters.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thats because the people who get those sort of jobs are not really I.T.
>>>> people, they are getting-government-jobs people.
>>>
>>> I know some of the people who work on Government IT projects. They're
>>> no different to people who work on commercial projects. Hell, I've done
>>> a tiny bit of consulting to Government, myself. What is different is
>>> the employer, who believes that the impossible can be achieved "because
>>> we're the Government".
>>>
>>
>>
>> I could name names, but I am sure that my thin veil of anonymity would
>> soon be ripped apart, and i would be sued. Lets say that some of them
>> are crap.
> 
> There are crap people everywhere.
> 
> 

Sturgeon's law:  Ninety percent of everything is crap.

-- 
numerist at aquaporin4 dot com
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618130
Author: Charles Richmond
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 20:20
26 lines
2522 bytes
On 12/28/2017 11:00 AM, Huge wrote:
> On 2017-12-28, Charles Richmond <nume...@aquaporin4.com> wrote:
>> On 12/28/2017 9:37 AM, Huge wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-28, maus <ma...@mail.com> wrote:
> 
> [34 lines snipped]
> 
>>>> I could name names, but I am sure that my thin veil of anonymity would
>>>> soon be ripped apart, and i would be sued. Lets say that some of them
>>>> are crap.
>>>
>>> There are crap people everywhere.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Sturgeon's law:  Ninety percent of everything is crap.
> 
> I've often wondered if this is recursive.
> 
> 

Maybe recursive only in the sense that you curse once... and then you 
curse again!  ;-)

-- 
numerist at aquaporin4 dot com
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618126
Author: jmfbahciv
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 14:24
36 lines
3057 bytes
Charles Richmond wrote:
> On 12/28/2017 3:01 AM, maus wrote:
>> On 2017-12-28, Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 2017-12-27, jmfbahciv <See....@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania wants IBM to pay for a failed
>>>>> computer system.  Detailed article at:
>>>>> http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/inq-phillydeals/pa-wants-160m-back-ib
m-reform-it-procurement-20171214.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Note--employees from the state say the state ordered numerous
>>>>> change orders to the system, and feel the state is at fault,
>>>>> not IBM.  Pennsylvania had a lot of problems with its unemployment
>>>>> compensation offices.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if PA hired the same people to code the system as Michigan
>>>> did.
>>>
>>> That's not necessary.  Governments everywhere - at all levels -
>>> have a talent for creating IT disasters.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thats because the people who get those sort of jobs are not really I.T.
>> people, they are getting-government-jobs people.
>>
>
> This is a big reason Grace Hopper was so valuable to the Navy!  She
> could whip the IT processing into shape!!!

More importantly, she could whip the generals into shape; listen to her
story about her physical nanoseconds.

/BAH
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618131
Author: Gene Wirchenko
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 19:02
21 lines
2582 bytes
On 28 Dec 2017 20:31:52 GMT, Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:

>On 2017-12-28, Charles Richmond <nume...@aquaporin4.com> wrote:

[snip]

>> Maybe recursive only in the sense that you curse once... and then you 
>> curse again!  ;-)
>
>Very apposite, given that I was trying to set up a fanless micro-PC at the
>same time as typing that. I'm surprised you couldn't hear the swearing Over
>There.

     Sorry, what was that?  My fan is too loud.

     (I actually have a fan on my desk.  It was not on, but the
straight line was too good.)

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618133
Author: hanc...
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 22:10
6 lines
1649 bytes
On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 7:26:41 PM UTC-5, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> That's not necessary.  Governments everywhere - at all levels -
> have a talent for creating IT disasters.

As does private sector firms.
Re: Pennsylvania vs. IBM litigation over failed system
#618132
Author: Walter Bushell
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:44
20 lines
2438 bytes
Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote:
>On 2017-12-28, maus <ma...@mail.com> wrote:

>I know some of the people who work on Government IT projects. They're
>no different to people who work on commercial projects. Hell, I've done
>a tiny bit of consulting to Government, myself. What is different is
>the employer, who believes that the impossible can be achieved "because
>we're the Government".

And there are plentus examples of Private Companies making disasters,
Equifax comes to mind and the myrid companies who (corporations are 
people) who neglect the most rudimentary protections for customer data.

O yes, Delta Airlines IIRC had a major snafu in their reservation 
system.- 
-- 
  O wad some Power the giftie gie us
  To see oursels as ithers see us!
  It wad frae mony a blunder free us,
  An' foolish notion:
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads