Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #622004Re: Has Microsoft commited suicide ...
From: hanc...
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:55
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:55
50 lines
3991 bytes
3991 bytes
On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 10:08:33 PM UTC-4, J. Clarke wrote: > >Microsoft and the hardware makers followed the auto industry > >model of planned obsolescence. My old PC physically works > >reasonably well, but the software is obsolete and difficult > >to use for many tasks since it is no longer compatible. > > > >Note that IBM provided old system compatibility going back 40 years. > >Would it kill the PC industry to provide that? > > The PC industry actually DOES provide old system compatibility going > back 40 years. Getting back to the 16-bit DOS era and beyond requires > using an emulator, which is no hardship given that you're running > about a thousand times the clock speed with multiple cores.. But that > given, I can boot up a CP/M session on my gaming rig and run 8-bit > Wordstar just fine (once I've hexedited the configuration file to > match the terminal that the emulator pretends to have). FWIW, on a personal note, I looked into running an emulator so I could run old DOS/Windows applications. However, installing it seemed difficult (it's possible I needed to simply devote more time to it.) However, I have little desire to "hexedit the configuration file" to make it all work. > > >As mentioned, they upgrade and upgrade but really don't improve > >anything. > > My newest machine can read my handwriting at least as well as the last > secretary I had and sometimes does what I tell it to do verbally. It > also recognzes me when I boot it up. > > However you talk about your "old PC physically works reasonably well > but the software is obsolete and difficult to use for many tasks since > it is no longer compatible". With what is it not compatible that is > causing you problems? My MS-Word and Internet Explorer have a difficult time today. For instance, I send Word documents to friends. They could only open it as Read-Only due to the old version. They could not get around that restriction without going to a lot of trouble. As someone mentioned, I now use plain text files. But things like italics and boldface get lost. It's impossible to send a more formal document with headings and pagination. As to the Internet, more and more websites no longer operate on my browser.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8a3d5a06-1fef-4a62-8950-eb9ca22453e0@googlegroups.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!c8-v6ni29694qtc.0!nntp.google.com!x25-v6no8469779qto.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<pbfi85$ek7$1@dont-email.me> <pbfpo4$2hdt$1@gal.iecc.com> <6g2tqe-i3i.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <pbikoe$2eq4$1@gal.iecc.com> <fk45t5F51o3U1@mid.individual.net> <20180423063942.76a51e6385f9ecf936b654f4@eircom.net> <aa7d0829-5db2-474e-87a2-a9f1852e2eff@googlegroups.com> <pbkt5l$puq$1@dont-email.me> <0839c169-eafd-4a18-8697-4c7b34896fb6@googlegroups.com> <gn0tdd5g5a8epi3fvcj3av8e8imbtjrpg4@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.55.155.5 with SMTP id d5mr19575880qke.49.1524599722541; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:55:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.12.190.136 with SMTP id n8ls974518qvi.2.gmail; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:55:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.12.128.106 with SMTP id 97mr2289919qva.1.1524599720562; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:55:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.31.151.23 with SMTP id z23mr3207060vkd.6.1524599720332; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!c8-v6ni29694qtc.0!nntp.google.com!x25-v6no8469779qto.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:55:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <gn0tdd5g5a8epi3fvcj3av8e8imbtjrpg4@4ax.com> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=8.41.192.198; posting-account=WKyNOQkAAACNglsCZiIox1kdy9R-66KH NNTP-Posting-Host: 8.41.192.198 References: <pbfi85$ek7$1@dont-email.me> <pbfpo4$2hdt$1@gal.iecc.com> <6g2tqe-i3i.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <pbikoe$2eq4$1@gal.iecc.com> <fk45t5F51o3U1@mid.individual.net> <20180423063942.76a51e6385f9ecf936b654f4@eircom.net> <aa7d0829-5db2-474e-87a2-a9f1852e2eff@googlegroups.com> <pbkt5l$puq$1@dont-email.me> <0839c169-eafd-4a18-8697-4c7b34896fb6@googlegroups.com> <gn0tdd5g5a8epi3fvcj3av8e8imbtjrpg4@4ax.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <8a3d5a06-1fef-4a62-8950-eb9ca22453e0@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Has Microsoft commited suicide ... From: hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:55:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit