🚀 go-pugleaf

In <339af917...@news.idt.net> men...@torah.org (Yaakov Menken)
writes: 
>
>On 8 Jun 1997 17:27:58 GMT, da...@taic.net wrote:
>>	However, there are still a whole lot of categories of information
>>which seem "really really relevant" after the fact, but if they are
not
>>spottable before the fact, are meaningless. Like the "Amir"
situation. For
>>even though one finds the name "Amir" next to the Rabin assassination
>>phrases, if one also finds 200 other Hebrew names, then this find is
>>nothing. Not useful before or after. However, for example, if one
finds
>>the phrase "Sus cachol" next to the Rabin Assassination phrasings,
even
>>though this phrase is totally meaningless and useless to someone
seeing it
>>(if he had a computer) 200 years ago, if it turns out that the
assassin of
>>Rabin fired while traveling in a blue Chevrolet, then this is an
example
>>of something highly significant and relevant after the fact, even
though
>>useless and irrelevant before the fact (no predictive value).
>
>Now here, I think you'll find yourself in complete agreement with the
>statisticians whose words I posted. _None_ of them believe that
>references to Amir or murderer around Rabin have any demonstrable
>relevance.
>
>The actual stastical study, otoh, carefully laid out a hypothesis in
>advance, and tested against a null hypothesis, and came up with
>(honestly) phenomenal results. These _were_ demonstrated to be
>statistically relevant, even though the whole business remains without
>predictive value for the future.
>
>YM
>
===>Question:

    How do youknow that the supposed "code" refers to RABIN and not
    RUBEN or something else? How do you no that "AMIR" is not MIRA
    or MARY or EMIR or AMORY or something else?

    Since there are no vowels in the Hebrew text, what is your
    probability of coming up with a two, three, or four-consonant word?

    LBRTRVS