Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #632802Re: The Bible Code
From: att...
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 1997 00:00
70 lines
3160 bytes
3160 bytes
In <5n99cc$dd...@sunshine.atl.com> pro...@solomons.temple.com (The
Prophet) writes:
>
>In his newly published book, _The Bible Code_, author Michael Drosnin
>reveals astounding predictions of, among other things, the Holocaust,
>the assasination of Rabin, and a yet to be cataclysmic earthquake in
>Los Angeles (well that's a no brainer -Ed). The quake is predicted in
>the year 2010 but by then Drosnin will have already pocketed his
profit.
>
>An Israeli mathematician, Eliyahu Rips, challenges the validity of the
>predicting the future by codes embeded in text but supposedly agrees
>that there is a poorly understood code buried in the Hebrew
Scriptures.
>He also states the Bible has predicted future events. In fact it was
>Rips who found the code by running a computer analysis on the sequence
>of 304,805 letters after removing the spacing between words.
>
>Drosnin seems to equivocate in that he says absolute certainties are
not
>coded but possibilities are as though they were meant to be warnings.
He
>also states that codes cannot be found in other literature, such as
Moby
>Dick, yet I have heard claims of these types of predictions being
found
>in the Koran.
>
>The author goes on to say that discovery of these codes awaited the
advent
>of the computer (duh -Ed) hence they were meant for our age which
implies
>to me that he believes the hoofbeats of the approaching Apocalypse
draw
>nigh. Yet he also claims to be a non religious Jew who does not
believe
>in God. What gives?
>
>I suppose a complex predictive code could theoretically be buried in a
>long text - kind of like a fractal but using letters. And I suppose
such
>a code could be the signature of a higher entity. But maybe humans
tend
>to find codes where non exist. And if one did exist, how would we
really
>know that the discoverer was not a crackpot?
>
>This isn't the first Bible code I've heard of but it is the most
complex.
>Are these codes compatible, I wonder, or do they compete in a mutually
>exclusive way? And how do they analyze text for such codes? Can any
>of this work be taken seriously?
>
>The Prophet
===>Of course. It is a serious manifestation of human ingenuity
and ability to hack away series of Hebrew letters of the
alphabet until something pops.
It is easier with space-free Hebrew script, because it lacks
any vowels, so it can be sliced many different ways and a
WRDCNMNLTSFTHNGS (word can mean lots of things).
Libertarius
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5naif0$eam@sjx-ixn7.ix.netcom.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5n99cc$ddj4@sunshine.atl.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: att...@ix.netcom.com(Libertarius) Subject: Re: The Bible Code Date: 1997/06/07 Message-ID: <5naif0$eam@sjx-ixn7.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 246688238 References: <5n99cc$ddj4@sunshine.atl.com> Organization: Netcom X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Jun 06 7:53:20 PM PDT 1997 Newsgroups: rec.org.mensa,sci.skeptic,sci.math,comp.misc,alt.folklore.science,alt.folklore.computers,alt.folklore.urban,soc.culture.jewish,talk.religion.misc,talk.religion.newage,alt.bible.prophecy,alt.atheism,alt.christnet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit