Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #632831Re: Why Mainframes?
From: steve wolfe
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 1997 00:00
51 lines
3130 bytes
3130 bytes
Douglas W. Jones,201H MLH,3193350740,3193382879 wrote: > > From article <33B8C6...@pce.net>, by Micheal Peters <mich...@pce.net>: > > Rashid J Al-Ali wrote: > >> > >> I am wondering, why people would use Mainframe computers.? > >> What are the major reasons for using mainframes.? > >> And what are the type of applications that mainframe would be used for? > > > > Well up untill recently Mainframes could crunch large formuls and > > numbers faster and more percice (gerr.. Missing my spell checker). > > Nah. A DEC Alpha is still the fastest single CPU on the market, and > mainframe CPU speed hasn't had much of an edge on microprocessor CPU > speed since the mid 1980's. > > Where mainframes really win is in massive I/O bandwidth. If you want > multimedia servers, with huge disk farms and massive network bandwidth, > a mainframe may serve you better than the competition. Even here, > though the super-micros built by folks like SGI and HP are chewing > away at the edge once held by mainframes. > > If you're stuck cramming your I/O through a SCSI bus, you'll never match > the performance of a system with multiple independent main memory busses > and multiple DMA channels that can move data at memory speed without > noticably slowing down the CPU. Of course, even in this arena, > minicomputers of the 1970's began to nibble at the mainframe market > (the Modcomp IV computer, a 32-bit mini delivered in 1974, had 4 memory > busses, 2 for I/O and 2 used by the CPU, one for instruction fetch and > one for operands). > > If you've got a legacy of ancient COBOL code, some of which was last > compiled 30 years ago and the source code itself is lost, you're likely > to want a mainframe! IBM and UNISYS still make good money selling > mainframes to folks in that bind, where performance isn't the issue > but compatability is everything. > > Doug Jones > jo...@cs.uiowa.edu I agree, but I think another major advantage of mainframes is concurrency. We have 35,000 users with sub second response time (plus the 3 second satellite transmission time that we can not control). PC servers can't handle that concurrency. -- **************************************************************************** email : prg...@epix.net url : http://www.epix.net/~prgsdw ****************************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33B999EF.795C@epix.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<33B8C697.393@pce.net> <5pbc2i$bfc$1@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: steve wolfe <prg...@epix.net> Subject: Re: Why Mainframes? Date: 1997/07/01 Message-ID: <33B999EF.795C@epix.net> X-Deja-AN: 254791669 References: <33B8C697.393@pce.net> <5pbc2i$bfc$1@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu> Organization: epix Internet Services Reply-To: prg...@epix.net Newsgroups: a.bsu.talk,alt.business.import-export.computer,alt.computer.consultants,alt.computer.consultants.ads,alt.computer.drivers.wanted,alt.folklore.computers,alt.omnidata.computer.brokers,alt.religion.computers,aol.commerce.computers.forsale,aol.commer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit