🚀 go-pugleaf

First of all, even if female management is a reasonable, or close
substitution for male management - which it IS NOT - there will
still be highly deleterious effects on the running of enterprises
and on the entire economy.

This is because the nature of competition is such that it is
subject to the natural law of the path of least resistance whereby
the most competitive entity will be number one by a wide margin
garnering the lion's share of the economic rewards EVEN IF IT IS
ONLY SLIGHTLY MORE COMPETITIVE.  If the number two entity does not
maintain equal competitiveness, it will be a distant number two.

Look to the world of boxing as an example.  If contender A is
slightly bigger and slightly stronger than contender B, then
contender A will knockout contender B almost every time and
claim the big payoff almost every time.

Female management is, at minimum, taking the edge off American
competitiveness such that foreign companies are prevailing in
just about every area of the economy (most notably Japan).
This is because the path of least resistance for economic
rewards has shifted to those foreign companies.

For sooth, female management IS NOT a close substitute for male
management.  Female management, with few rare exceptions, has 
proven itself to be atrocious!

Here we are pissing away our own birthright and that of our
posterity all for the sake of granting to certain twit-brains
and bitch-brains the pleasure of stomping through an office
and barking out orders like a little Imelda to substandard,
pusillanimous male subordinates.

The Treatise on the Downward Wage Equalizing Effects of
Equal Employment Opportunity is available at:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/3982/