🚀 go-pugleaf

We found some C code around here not too long ago that looked
something like this:

	for (i=0; i<10; i++) {
		switch (i) {
		case 0: <random code> break;
		case 1: <random code> break;
		case 2: <random code> break;
		...
		case 9: <random code> break;
		}
	}

Yes, the loser was using a for loop and a switch to impart default
sequential control flow on a section of code.

Added silly note...  I wonder how many C programs there are out there
which have "default" switch conditions where default is spelled wrong
(making it look like a goto label).  I've seen defualt at least, and I
know I've seen this bug on several occasions, in such places as
the AT&T 5.3 sources.

	Andrew Tannenbaum   Interactive   Cambridge, MA   +1 617 661 7474