Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #846At Last! The voice of Reason!
From: ncr... Nichael Cramer
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1990 02:59
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1990 02:59
26 lines
1615 bytes
1615 bytes
{Re: The recent discussion concerning when a decade/century/millennium
begins. -- N}
>From The Boston Globe's "Letters to the Editor", of 5 JAN 1990:
IN THE YEAR 0? IMPOSSIBLE
I am tired on{sic} the bean-counters who insist that 1990 is not the
beginning of a new decade, or that Jan. 1, 2000, the beginning of a new
century.
Clearly, there could not be a year "0," which is an abstract concept that
cannot have real existence (or it would not be "zero"), despite computers
that insist "0" is a number. Can you imagine Dec. 31, 0, AD?
It is logically impossible to have a real year 0, just as you cannot have 0
dollars. Is a $20 bill worth only $19 because there is no $0 bill?
So one can argue that the first "decade" had only nine years, and therefore
every subsequent decade (century, millennium) begins with the "0" year.
Up with common sense, down with bean-counters!
XXXXXXX X. XXXXXXXX
Auburn {Mass}
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<50810@bbn.COM>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!bbn!bbn.com!ncramerShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!bbn!bbn.com!ncramer From: ncr...@bbn.com (Nichael Cramer) Newsgroups: rec.games.trivia,alt.folklore.computers Subject: At Last! The voice of Reason! Message-ID: <50810@bbn.COM> Date: 12 Jan 90 02:59:11 GMT Sender: ne...@bbn.COM Reply-To: ncr...@BBN.COM (Nichael Cramer) Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA Lines: 26 Posted: Fri Jan 12 03:59:11 1990 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit