🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <EGpE71.z9...@deshaw.com>,  <mi...@aishdas.org> wrote:
>Remember, what started this sub-thread was my bringing a source that
>the original researchers, Vintzum et al, already did a comparison with
>the Samaritan text. This would indicate that they /do/ have a digitized
>version. The results were negative, more so, the Samaritan text showed
>very close (well within one std deviation) to the expected number of
>"codes" predicted by Vintzum's model -- at least for the patterns tested.
>
>I find it odd that you are going on
>
>If you can read Hebrew, check the book.

I didn't say anything about the Samaritan text, and as I indicated in
another post on this thread, I would not be surprised to learn that it
does exist in digitized format. As for whether it can pass some sort of
test as well or better than any particular version of the Masoretic
text, you'll have to forgive me if I reserve judgement. What if some
Samaritans find all sorts of great connections to *their* leaders,
yahrtzeits, etc?

Whatever the case, the Samaritan text has nothing to do with the 
issues I posted. 

-- 
-----------------------
Jack F. Love
Opinions expressed are mine alone, unless you happen to agree