Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #632839Re: Why Mainframes?
From: k... Ken Nelson
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 1997 00:00
54 lines
3543 bytes
3543 bytes
postmaster nospam _ ennis @ mail . escape . ca (Sean Ennis) writes: >"Rashid J Al-Ali" <ras...@qatar.net.qa> writes: >] I am wondering, why people would use Mainframe computers.? >] What are the major reasons for using mainframes.? >] And what are the type of applications that mainframe would be used for? >It's cheeper that way. Thinkabout it... when mainframes were REALLY popular >memory and processor cycles were _REALLY_ expensive. Instead of giving a >really expensive computer to everyone who needed to use one, they could >just put together one super-expensive (but cheeper than everyone having their >own) computer and hang enough dumb-terminals off of it for the people who >needed it... to use. In addition, you could also hang several more terminals >off of it for other people to use (people who were border line in need of >a computer, or their work would just bennifit from access to ome). >Not long ago (i.e. 1980's), processors and memmory dropped in price >significantly, and we started having PC's on everyone's desks (cheeper to have >these little PC's - and more convienient - than to go and use the MainFrame). >Now... we're finding that administering 100 PC's takes a lot of resources. >It seems that there are just to many 'man hours' required to do it. >Luser^H^H^H^H^HUsers whipe out their hard drives, bring in viruses from home, >mess with the configuration files, and cause all sorts of trouble. Machines >break down or need new software installed. Peopel want to be able to go from >machine to machine - log in, and have the same desk top/settings everywhere. >So new we're going back to having a super expensive machine (that can be >administered by one or two people) and lots of cheep 'smart terminals' >hung off them (just enough HD space to be able to contact the server and >load the OS, and the run everything off the big server). >Kind of like the Red Queen's race - you have to run as fast as you can just >to stay in the same place. >Sean >-- >Wally : "Stupidity is like nuclear |From: header mashed to prevent junk >power; it can be used for good or evil."|mail. If you have something important >Dilbert : "And you don't ---------------|to say, remove the nospam_, spaces and >want to get any on you." | the postmaster from the 'From:' line. Sean Ennis O- In the early 70s, I was working for RCA , they were building mainframes then, and RCA was trying to market "Octaputers" a big mainframe that would be a lot of terminals linked together with the mainframe. The new competition was DEC's minicomputers. I held then as I do now that if things were fairly even, people would opt for their very own computer and reject the Octaputer. I hold the same thought today. regards --- ken
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ECo6My.2LK@iglou.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bc8523$84da9b80$e12185c2@rashid1> <5pbb39$j19$1@wpg-02.escape.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: k...@iglou1.iglou.com (Ken Nelson) Subject: Re: Why Mainframes? Date: 1997/07/02 Message-ID: <ECo6My.2LK@iglou.com> X-Deja-AN: 254037122 Sender: ne...@iglou.com (News) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: iglou1 References: <01bc8523$84da9b80$e12185c2@rashid1> <5pbb39$j19$1@wpg-02.escape.ca> X-Nntp-Posting-User: kbn Organization: IgLou Internet Services (1-800-436-4456) Newsgroups: a.bsu.talk,alt.business.import-export.computer,alt.computer.consultants,alt.computer.consultants.ads,alt.computer.drivers.wanted,alt.folklore.computers,alt.omnidata.computer.brokers,alt.religion.computers,aol.commerce.computers.forsale,aol.commer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit