🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <01bbf791$3d287200$5af9...@px50.dial.pipex.com>,
"Simon P. Smith" <wolf...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:

> I don't know who you are, but I do know that you are one ignorant and
> misogynistic sonofabitch - I can't think of any other way to describe you.

My name is "Jeremy Miller." They call me "Jeremy Miller." I just like
using the handle "Anonymous" because the net has a tradition of supporting
anonymity, and "Anonymous" can't be disciplined for spamming.


> Not only did you completely ignore the facts about increases in
> productivity from automation and computerisation, which I put you right on
> in an earlier posting

No, you didn't!

When I see increases in productivity then I will believe in them.
I said it before and I will say it again:  if computers are so
wonderful, we would be seeing ever improving standards of living,
but we are, in actuality, seeing quite the opposite.

Sophistry! Look at the huge number of people dying of polio today.

> I now see you're determined to blame your country's
> apparent economic decline (I wish Britain was suffering a 'decline' like
> yours, mate!) on equal opportunities and the promotion of women into
> management!

Well, you have to admit that there seems to be quite a correlation
between the passage of the equal employment and housing laws and
the deterioration of U.S. society. There is also a correlation between
people who listen to me and people who believe that Elvis is alive.


> Strange then that of the most successful business people under the age of
> 35 in Britain in 1996 nearly half were women, eh?

This would not strike me as being strange in the U.S. In fact, nothing
strikes me as strange, not even my own schizophrenic behavior. Perhaps
this is because my various pseudonyms, which are mainly arguing with
each other, don't bother to read my own posts.

I never said that women were not good at launching new enterprises.
Sophistry! I simply said they were good for nothing but fucking.
A new business is a very undefined or ill-defined situation, and
women seem to do well under such circumstances.  However, there
comes a time when the organization matures and needs just that -
that is, ORGANIZATION.  This is why, historically (most notably
prior to equal employment opportunity) females would turn over
their enterprises to professional male managers.


> That their biggest handicap was the misogynistic attitude of males...
> because they didn't like the idea of having a woman boss!

So tell me, Simon, to what would you attribute this dislike of
males for working for a female boss?  There's a saying:  "One
billions flies can't be wrong!"  Right?  I know because flies are
always swarming around my bullshit! Sophistry!