🚀 go-pugleaf

Richard Latker wrote:
> 
> Some frustrated idiot wrote:
> >
> > The largest demographic group doing the most damage to
> > American society and its economy is comprised of the white
> > females.
> 
> An excellent article in the Economist in October 1996 comes to the exact
> opposite conclusion--ie, that it is men that are less flexible, less
> trainable and even slightly less intelligent than women--and does so
> through an exhaustive analysis of fact (rather than your petty sour
> grapes). Women, on average, work harder, learn more quickly and tolerate
> change more effectively than men do.

And, in the U.S. at least, do it all for significantly less money than
men do (I make more than twice as much money as my wife for a job
comparable in frustration, etc.).  Curious.

> Managers of high-tech manufacturing operations often prefer women
> labourers, if they are asked, because they are perceived to be more
> meticulous than men. Women are thought to be better personnel managers,
> teachers, doctors and researchers. It's only at the very top that women
> are considered less desirable, because they have this habit of getting
> pregnant and taking maternity leave.

True, all of it.  Women, in my experience, are (generally) better
teachers and personnel managers.  I can't speak to the others, but don't
doubt its truth.

> > 1.)  They will not tolerate having capable male subordinates
> > working for them (at least not on a permanent or long-term
> > basis.)

Complete bull****.  I have worked for several women, and they ALL
WITHOUT EXCEPTION recognized my strengths, were more honest than the men
I have worked for in recognizing my weaknesses, and helped me work on
them better.

> > With this being the case, it does not take long for
> > performance, behavioral, and all other standards within the
> > female's realm of responsibility to hit rock bottom.
> 
> What you mean is this: "My boss pissed me off. She was a woman. Women
> should be subordinate to men, damnit, not the other way around. The
> whole fucking thing makes me feel inadequate, especially since I realise
> my skills base isn't worth what it used to be."

Exactly.
 
> > 2.)   Females are the operatives of the Jews.
> 
> Translation: "The hottest babe in the office started started sleeping
> with this *fucking* jewish guy. Damn, this pisses me off."

Hee hee!  Another would-be office Romeo shot down.  I **love** it!

> > Female Management, a Case Study:
> 
> <Long tirade about how unfair the world is to men of marginal talent
> snipped>

<And a worthy snip, at that>

> Any successful, accomplished person does not blame others for their
> failures -- this is a basic rule of life to which even some of your
> white power buddies agree (not many, it's true. Most of them blame Jews
> for their own inability to adapt and thrive in a changing world). The
> most successful western institutions, corporate or otherwise, have both
> men and women in positions of power throughout the management hierarchy.
> 
> > Many millions of dollars were wasted, this by a
> > company which would not give a ten cent raise to a deserving
> > white male worker!
> 
> Yep, you hold on to that resentment, buddy. While the rest of us white
> male workers -- who a) work hard and smart with men and women of all
> types b) have learned how to learn, and c) still manage to get laid now
> and then -- prosper and enjoy ourselves, you can find yourself a
> submissive little housewife to smack around. She'll wash your clothes
> while you down Budweisers in front of the TV, and you can live out your
> male-supremacist fantasies in blissful sloth.

MY wife is not submissive.  Right now she's pissed off about much of
what the original poster's buddies have done to her.  She's thinking
about leaving her company for one who will pay her in a manner more
commensurate with the MILLIONS she saves her company yearly.  In a fair
society, she'd easily be making IN THE RANGE of what I'm making, if not
much more.  I'd prefer more, because I'd likely be able to retire soon,
cleaning the house and weeding the garden.  More likely it'll be the
other way around, more's the pity for a thinking manager. 

> RL

Dan