🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #625561

Re: changing architectures [was Re: PDP-10 addressing, PDP 11/40 system manual]

#625561
From: Johnny Billquist
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:29
49 lines
4209 bytes
On 2018-08-13 21:48, Rich Alderson wrote:
> John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> writes:
> 
>> In article <0897e059-0b26-4334...@googlegroups.com>,
>> Quadibloc  <jsa...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
> 
>>> I think it was ugly too; but I suppose that it could still be said that if
>>> the memory expansion method actually used was a kludge, that doesn't prove
>>> th at something better might not be possible.
> 
>> The people who did it were pretty smart.  An obvious alternative would be a
>> mode bit, like 16 vs 32 bit segments on the 386, and different instruction
>> formats, but if it's not backward compatible with 18 bit code, you might as
>> well switch to a Vax, which is what everyone did.
> 
> Speaking from personal experience here, no, that's not what they did.
> 
> Most PDP-10 customers (where that's a cover term for the entire line) were so
> pissed at Digital for the Jupiter cancellation that when they moved off of the
> 36-bit architecture, they went with anything available which wasn't a Digital
> product.
> 
> I can say this as the former sales support manager for the manufacturer of an
> extended clone of the KL-10 processor in the DECSYSTEM-20.  When we brought the
> XKL Toad-1 System to market in 1996, the VP of sales and I did a phone survey
> of every potential customer he had ever spoken to, and learned just how many
> systems had been decommissioned in the preceding 12 months in favor of one or
> another high-end Unix offering or IBM system.  Almost none of them had gone to
> VMS or OSF/1 on Alpha (by then, Digital's only hardware offering).
> 
> (NB:  Translating titles above, I was the entire customer/sales support
>   organization at the time, and he was the entire sales force.  We expected to
>   grow.)

While I think you are right, in general I think the reflection and 
reaction wasn't hitting the VAX itself that much. But VMS.
I think that DECs attempt at pushing the PDP-10 customers to switch to 
VMS was a total failure, and where people just told DEC to piss off.
I don't know if some might have gone with VAXen, but they most certainly 
did not go with VMS. That was a group of customers who pretty much 
universally went to Unix.

   Johnny

-- 
Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                   ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: b...@softjar.se             ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Technical Details
Message-ID: <pku7ef$2lj$1@Iltempo.Update.UU.SE>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!c189-v6ni215ith.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed.Update.UU.SE!news.Update.UU.SE!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <21aaeee8-c41a-4442-a4eb-ea6a29b1e4f1@googlegroups.com> <1173318279.555679658.757757.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <pkmv0r$2bhi$1@gal.iecc.com> <0897e059-0b26-4334-82ff-5c0b2253a89e@googlegroups.com> <pkpj7i$4o0$1@gal.iecc.com> <mddeff2t5dz.fsf_-_@panix5.panix.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 2002:a24:6b54:: with SMTP id v81-v6mr7979768itc.13.1534238992386;        Tue, 14 Aug 2018 02:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com
Received: by 2002:a02:a78e:: with SMTP id e14-v6ls3320969jaj.11.gmail; Tue, 14 Aug 2018 02:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a02:12d9:: with SMTP id 86-v6mr9893768jap.53.1534238991655;        Tue, 14 Aug 2018 02:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!c189-v6ni215ith.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed.Update.UU.SE!news.Update.UU.SE!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Johnny Billquist <b...@softjar.se>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: changing architectures [was Re: PDP-10 addressing, PDP 11/40 system manual]
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 11:29:51 +0200
Organization: Update Computer Club
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <pku7ef$2lj$1@Iltempo.Update.UU.SE>
References: <21aaeee8-c41a-4442-a4eb-ea6a29b1e4f1@googlegroups.com> <1173318279.555679658.757757.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <pkmv0r$2bhi$1@gal.iecc.com> <0897e059-0b26-4334-82ff-5c0b2253a89e@googlegroups.com> <pkpj7i$4o0$1@gal.iecc.com> <mddeff2t5dz.fsf_-_@panix5.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.53.238.109
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: Iltempo.Update.UU.SE 1534238991 2739 77.53.238.109 (14 Aug 2018 09:29:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsm...@Update.UU.SE
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:29:51 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
In-Reply-To: <mddeff2t5dz.fsf_-_@panix5.panix.com>
Bytes: 3856
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit