Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #625418Re: Intersil 6100 uP
From: Michael Black
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 15:41
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 15:41
41 lines
3082 bytes
3082 bytes
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Brian Reay wrote: > In the mid/late 70s, when I was at Uni, I had a vacation job and worked on a > project involving the 6100 uP. > > Initially, I was let loose on a simple singe board dev system (if you can > call it that), a simple keyboard, 7 segment display etc, as was common at the > time. > > Eventually, I was trusted to use a 'real computer' - laughable by today's > standards but ..... . It was a typical (at the time) 'Pizza Box' 6100 based > unit, I'm pretty sure it had toggle switches for data and address set up etc > but I used other machines around then and it was 40 years ago, the usual LEDs > etc. I/O was teletype etc.- no CRT etc. I'm sure at the time, Intersil were > the only make of the 6100 and probably made the Pizza Box. > > Purely for old times sake, I'd like to try and acquire one- if the price is > right. > > Does anyone know the beast, please? > The 6100's big fame was that it was an IC version of the PDP-8. It rand the code, but of course missed out on the front panel and probably some other missing bits. Someone I knew got a contract to computerize a local vinyl record press, and I'm not sure how that started, but he had someone in who was very familiar with the PDP-8, though of course the Intersil 6100 had the secondary advantage of being CMOS, low current. So they made a board, worked the software, with a probably expensive terminal that fitted into a calculator case, I can't remember any details beyond that. So they got it going, tested it at the plant, and then produced a bunch. This was 1980, little did they know the future was in CDs. I don't recall a development board or system made by Intersil. I do vaguely recall there was a commerical computer that used the 6100, but details escape me. This wasn't a big company, so not a familiar name. I think there was an article in Kilobaud about it, but maybe it was Byte. Michael
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<alpine.LNX.2.20.1807231136550.22392@thrush>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!d15-v6ni16wmb.0!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<pj4df0$dml$3@dont-email.me>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f303:: with SMTP id q3-v6mr1164297wmq.16.1532360563443; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:42:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:adf:fac3:: with SMTP id a3-v6ls814639wrs.8.gmail; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:42:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:e8cd:: with SMTP id k13-v6mr1205530wrn.31.1532360562916; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!d15-v6ni16wmb.0!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Michael Black <mbl...@pubnix.net> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Intersil 6100 uP Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:41:30 -0400 Lines: 42 Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.20.1807231136550.22392@thrush> References: <pj4df0$dml$3@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net HGvetyW6yXliLQxwcwZmBgCsod2XNBSC3iocAMhZXSkopRvHeB X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:7OQfcjAcufmGPUPsIYF8YEqPG5w= In-Reply-To: <pj4df0$dml$3@dont-email.me> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LNX 67 2015-01-07) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit