Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621578Re: Old word processors
From: ma...
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:02
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:02
56 lines
3702 bytes
3702 bytes
On 2018-03-23, Andreas Kohlbach <a...@spamfence.net> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:13:01 -0700 (PDT), hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: >> >> On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 5:13:30 PM UTC-4, Andreas Kohlbach wrote: >> >>> I think I understand a word processor is something you edit a text. It >>> assists you by wrapping text and allow modification of characters, like >>> bold. Only *after* you are done editing you would print it out or save it >>> to a file. You could move paragraphs around and often do mail >>> merge. Things a Selectric could not do. >> >> I think of a word processor as something that _stores_ text so >> that it does not have to be retyped. Everything is icing on the cake. > > That is already provided by any simple text editor.; That caught me recently. Worddprocessors sometimes store data that you do not really want. > >>> The Selectric did not (for my knowledge) had a display. Even if it might >>> had "write ahead" you could not see what you wrote until it was printed >>> on paper. If you made a mistake it was too late. Because of that >>> typewriters soon vanished after word processors were available in the >>> late 70s to early 80s. >>> >>> Which again raises the question: if word processors were around before >>> the 70s, why didn't they supersede typewriters in offices already? >> >> First, word processing machines were very expensive, far more so >> than a typewriter. Back in the early 1970s, I made $2.15/hour as >> a typist--it was cheaper having people like me bang out reports, >> even with multiple drafts, than getting something like an MT/ST >> (which they did have.) > > Thus they ran on mainframes, with the typists logging in from a cheap > dumb terminal. > >> Second, typists prepare many different kinds of documents. Some >> do lend themselves readily to word processing due to the repetitive >> nature of the text. But other typewritten material does not lend >> itself to word processing. This would include custom letters, >> documents prepared from computer output (before consolidated >> merged processing), forms, envelopes, postcards, and index >> cards and file tabs. > > That is where "mail merge" steps in. Already WordStar has this function. > > [...] -- greymaus.ireland.ie Just_Another_Grumpy_Old_Man
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrnpbc1fv.18d.mausg@smaus.org>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!d3-v6ni1125itf.0!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!130.133.4.4.MISMATCH!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <ed7db516-35d3-43b4-a2fe-9a73d02e38fc@googlegroups.com> <87zi2ysbpy.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 2002:a24:b044:: with SMTP id b4-v6mr6293845itj.8.1521878533393; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 01:02:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.160.193 with SMTP id j184ls2382086ioe.7.gmail; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 01:02:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.107.170.133 with SMTP id g5mr14413343ioj.35.1521878532554; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 01:02:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!d3-v6ni1125itf.0!nntp.google.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!130.133.4.4.MISMATCH!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: ma...@mail.com Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Old word processors Date: 24 Mar 2018 08:02:11 GMT Lines: 56 Message-ID: <slrnpbc1fv.18d.mausg@smaus.org> References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <ed7db516-35d3-43b4-a2fe-9a73d02e38fc@googlegroups.com> <87zi2ysbpy.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> X-Trace: individual.net 4P83gYMhZGdJL6l0FNASyAdAZpl+973c5I9ET7LbfJ5O7IG7Ie Cancel-Lock: sha1:XpG8VVNUklEdI0yUSLwLrFLoKhI= User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux) X-Received-Bytes: 3059 X-Received-Body-CRC: 883362535 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit